Skip to content

Using Holevo bound for leakage estimation in quantum key distribution

Sep 2026 · AVS Quantum Science · 0 citations · 11 references

TL;DR

It is shown that general post-selective soft-filtering transformations of side-channel states can be consistently incorporated into the GLLP and Koashi framework, and a Holevo-based upper bound on the eavesdropper's information for decoy-state BB84 is derived.

Abstract

Side-channel imperfections in quantum key distribution (QKD) are often treated within the GLLP and Koashi framework, which typically produces overly conservative key-rate estimates. Conditional-entropy approaches based on the Holevo bound provide a less pessimistic alternative but must correctly account for post-selective measurements, such as unambiguous state discrimination. We show that general post-selective soft-filtering transformations of side-channel states can be consistently incorporated into this framework. By relating the distinguishability of filtered Trojan-horse-attack states to observable parameters, namely, the reflected mean photon number and the single-photon yield, we derive a Holevo-based upper bound on the eavesdropper's information for decoy-state BB84. Numerical comparison demonstrates that this method yields significantly higher key rates than the GLLP and Koashi approach when the side-channel intensity is large, extending the secure distance by tens of kilometers. This provides a practical and tighter tool for leakage estimation in modern QKD systems.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Making the most of leftovers: Improved privacy amplification for quantum key distribution

The amount of secret key that can be obtained from a quantum key distribution run depends on both the physically observed error rates and the mathematical bounds used to certify security. For finite datasets, conservative bounds force users to discard a substantial fraction of the potentially available key. Here we fur...

M. Tan, Bartosz Regula, Marco Tomamichel · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Security framework for practical quantum key distribution with imperfect devices

This work presents a security proof for generic prepare-and-measure QKD protocols, including decoy-state BB84, with imperfect and imperfectly characterized sources and detectors using the marginal-constrained entropy accumulation theorem (MEAT).

Jerome Wiesemann, John Burniston, Devashish Tupkary et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The security of practical post-selection in Gaussian-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution

Gaussian-modulated coherent-state (GMCS) continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD) offers a practical path to quantum-secured communication owing to its compatibility with existing optical fibre networks and use of mature security proofs. Achieving high secret key rates in real-time systems, however, re...

Adam Alderton, Amanda Weerasinghe, Muataz Alhussein et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Computing key rates for one-sided device-independent quantum key distribution

The defining feature of one-sided device-independent quantum key distribution is its asymmetric trust model in which only one party is characterized. This scenario sets an interesting middle ground between high key rates achievable by characterizing devices and the security of full device-independence. Here, we provide...

Andreas Bluhm, Gereon Koßmann, Martin Sandfuchs et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Quantum key distribution using generalized contextuality against post-quantum eavesdroppers

Bell nonlocality allows secret key to be certified without trusting the internal operation of the devices, and even against eavesdroppers constrained only by the no-signaling principle. We ask whether generalized contextuality, a notion of nonclassicality available in prepare-and-measure experiments on a single system,...

Daniel Centeno, Roberto D. Baldijão, Maria Ciudad Alan'on et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Learnt Attacks on Quantum Key Distribution under Channel Noise and Device Drift

Quantum key distribution (QKD) links are provisioned from security analyses of stationary channels, whereas the devices that determine the channel drift between recalibrations. Whether an eavesdropper who cannot alter the channel's own noise gains by following that drift has not been quantified. Adaptive eavesdropping...

Marcel Mordarski, Benjamin I. Gräs, A. Shehata et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.