Does genetic liability for autism influence alcohol use?

Abstract

A body of research suggests that autistic individuals are less likely to drink alcohol than neurotypicals. However, emerging studies support a link between autism and alcohol use. This complex relationship is also reflected in studies that have examined the genetic overlap between the two traits. However, it is unclear whether there is a direct causal relationship between them. To explore this, we applied a combination of polygenic score and Mendelian randomisation analyses using publicly available genome-wide summary statistics and phenotypic measures of autism and alcohol consumption from UK Biobank. LD score regression analyses did not provide evidence of a genetic correlation between genetic liability for autism and drinks consumed per week (rg=-0.08; CI95%=-0.19, 0.03). Further, findings from polygenic score analyses did not support an association between genetic liability for autism and overall monthly alcohol intake. Univariable Mendelian randomisation analyses showed little evidence for a total effect of autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or depression on overall monthly alcohol consumption. Multivariable Mendelian randomisation analyses also showed little evidence of a direct effect of autism on drinks per week when controlling for ADHD and depression. It is plausible that genetic liability for autism does not directly increase the amount of alcohol consumed but instead operates via commonly co-occurring difficulties in the autistic community. However, our findings may be due to methodological shortcomings, including weak instruments biasing effects towards to the null. Consequently, results should be interpreted with caution and further research conducted to address these issues.