Sep 2026· Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences· Vol 38· 0 citations· 42 references
TL;DR
The proposed meta-adaptive resampling selection plus plus (MARS) is a stability aware meta-adaptive framework that chooses the best method based on the data based on the data, suggesting that selecting methods based on stability worked well on the evaluated datasets.
Abstract
Machine learning models are widely used in computer vision and classification tasks. However, imbalanced classification biases predictive models toward larger classes, reducing predictive performance for minority classes. To address this challenge, we propose meta-adaptive resampling selection plus plus (MARS + +), a stability aware meta-adaptive framework that chooses the best method based on the data. It can select from different types, such as resampling, hybrid, and algorithm-based methods. The proposed method uses inner cross-validation to test each option. It selects methods based on both performance and stability by combing predictive performance and variability across folds (mean − λ·std). It also avoids using any method if none gives clear improvement. MARS + + is tested on multiple benchmark datasets with varying imbalance levels, including both tabular and image data. We use two classifiers, the random forest and logistic regression. The results show that no single method is always the best. MARS + + still gives results close to the best choice in most cases. It also avoids the large drops in performance seen in some other methods. Statistical tests support the effectiveness of adaptive selection. This shows the importance of selecting methods based on the data. In addition, we provide a detailed analysis of method selection, and also examine cases where no method is selected. Finally, the study analyzes how close the results are to the best possible performance. It also examines how dataset features, such as imbalance and sample size, affect the method selection. These results suggest that selecting methods based on stability worked well on the evaluated datasets. They also support using an adaptive imbalance handling strategy.
Class imbalance remains a critical challenge in supervised learning, often biasing classifiers toward majority classes. While resampling techniques like Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) are widely used, the combined effect of data balancing and hyperparameter optimization across diverse datasets is rar...
Necati Vardar, Mehmet Fatih Ören· Sakarya University Journal o...· 0 citations
The proposed framework is able to effectively deal with the class imbalance, reduce the prediction bias, improve minority class detection and offer a scalable and interpretable solution for various real world intelligent decision support applications in different domains.
Prabha Ravi· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
Multi-class imbalanced classification remains difficult because minority classes can be poorly recognised even when aggregate performance appears acceptable. Many imbalance-handling methods still rely on a fixed technique, a single selected technique, or one level of adaptation, despite the fact that technique suitabil...
S. Obe, D. Matthias, E. O. Bennett· Journal of Artificial Intell...· 0 citations
This thesis focus on enhancing the performance of XGBoost for the classification of imbalanced data by performing k-fold cross validation and hyper- parameters tuning.
Amit Rauniyar, Prem Chandra Roy, Anisha Pokhrel et al.· Journal of Hillside College...· 0 citations
This paper proposes a meta-learning framework that leverages a comprehensive set of meta-features capturing dataset complexity to predict classifier performance without exhaustive training, and achieves an average ranking prediction accuracy exceeding 86%, demonstrating its effectiveness in guiding model selection.
Zahra Nabizadeh-ShahreBabak, Farzaneh Koohestani, Nader Karimi et al.· 0 citations
ASWBoost, a robust boosting algorithm, is proposed by introducing a parameter θ to modify the exponential loss, and significantly outperforms AdaBoost, CS-AdaBoost, GBDT, SMOTEBoost, and RUSBoost, with overall performance comparable to XGBoost.
Fei Meng, Mei Yan, Hang Liu et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.