A Fragmentation Boundary Model is presented that identifies when post-quantum payloads approach or exceed the non-fragmenting IKE_SA_INIT payload budget across ML-KEM parameter sets, Internet Protocol (IP) versions, and effective path maximum transmission units (PMTUs).
Abstract
The Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) underpins Internet Protocol Security (IPsec) by establishing secure associations and negotiating cryptographic keys. Its reliance on classical public-key primitives such as Elliptic Curve Diffie–Hellman (ECDH) renders it vulnerable to quantum attacks, as Shor’s algorithm can break these schemes once large-scale quantum computers become available. To address this challenge, we integrate post-quantum cryptography into IKEv2 using a hybrid key exchange combining ECDH over P-384 with the ML-KEM-768 parameter set of the Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism (ML-KEM), following Request for Comments (RFC) 9370 and RFC 9242. We present a Fragmentation Boundary Model that identifies when post-quantum payloads approach or exceed the non-fragmenting IKE_SA_INIT payload budget across ML-KEM parameter sets, Internet Protocol (IP) versions, and effective path maximum transmission units (PMTUs). We implemented the hybrid design on a Texas Instruments TM4C1294 microcontroller running FreeRTOS and CycloneTCP, and measured its execution time, memory footprint, and network overhead. Across 150 successful handshakes per configuration, mean Security Association establishment time increased from 3390.4 to 3488.6 ms, an overhead of 98.2 ms (2.9%). Flash use increased by 8%, random-access memory (RAM) use by 5%, and total IKEv2 traffic size by 42%, while no IP fragmentation was observed under the evaluated Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) conditions. These findings establish the feasibility of the evaluated hybrid configuration on the TM4C1294 platform and provide a platform-specific baseline for further evaluation of quantum-resilient IPsec on embedded automotive architectures.
Results show that ML-KEM and hybrid ML-KEM can be integrated into SSH without prohibitive application-level session setup overhead, and support migration toward standardized post-quantum mechanisms in SSH-based gateway and remote-access environments, provided that algorithm choice and system configuration are validated...
Shahid Allah Bakhsh, Inam ul Haq, Tarek Helmy et al.· Frontiers of Computer Scienc...· 0 citations
Results demonstrate that, compared with standalone ECDHE-P256 and standalone ML-KEM-768, the proposed hybrid framework introduces only minimal computational overhead while maintaining stable resource utilization, indicating that the integration of classical and post-quantum cryptographic mechanisms does not constitute...
W. Maya, Teuku Yuliar Arif, Hammam Riza et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
This paper suggests that as a key exchange mechanism, BB84 should be run with security parameters comparable to those of ML-KEM, and analyzes performance implications if this choice is taken, and offers general guidelines for BB84 parameter selection.
Sara Nikula, Mari Muurman· Cryptography· 0 citations
The review argues that readiness depends on protocol binding, implementation behavior, monitoring, and governance as much as on algorithm strength, and develops a deployment-readiness framework with four layers: security continuity, protocol integration, operational observability, and crypto-agility.
Yan Zhang· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
Key encapsulation mechanisms are a fundamental primitive for establishing shared secrets in modern secure communication systems. NIST SP 800-227 defines a KEM as a three-stage construction consisting of key generation, encapsulation, and decapsulation, and emphasizes that correctness, implementation security, and deplo...
V. Yatskiv, S. Ivasiev, N. Yatskiv et al.· Automation, Control, and Inf...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.