Skip to content
#edge computing Conference

Photonic-inspired multiscale frequency fusion for low-light YOLO detection

Sep 2026 · International Conference on Photonic Computing, Algorithms, and Machine Vision · Vol 14320, pp. 143200B - 143200B-12 · 0 citations · 9 references
Engineering

Abstract

Low-light object detection remains challenging because insufficient illumination, weak local contrast, noise, color distortion, and blurred object boundaries can degrade the visual information required by object detectors. Although image enhancement is commonly applied before detection, a visually brighter image does not necessarily yield better detection performance. This paper presents a photonic-inspired multi-scale frequency fusion enhancement operator, termed PIISEMF, for detection-oriented low-light YOLO processing. PIISE-MF operates on the LAB luminance channel and combines multi-scale Gaussian filtering, a darkness-adaptive weight, local gamma-based illumination compensation, and bounded band-pass residual fusion. A class-balanced and luminance-stratified 50-image ExDark development set was used to evaluate the original image, fixed conventional enhancement branches, and the proposed PIISE-MF weak and strong branches. Official ExDark annotations were used to calculate true positives, false positives, false negatives, Precision, Recall, and F1-score using class-aware IoU-based matching. On this development set, the PIISE-MF weak branch achieved 83 true positives, 46 false positives, and 59 false negatives, improving F1-score from 0.5912 for the original branch to 0.6125. This result is also slightly higher than the evaluated CLAHE branch (0.6081). The current implementation is conducted in the digital domain for algorithmic validation. Its core linear operations are deliberately designed to be compatible with photonic analog computing architectures, providing a feasible pathway for future hardware acceleration in edge-side vision systems. Detection-guided adaptive branch selection remains under development and is not reported as a completed result in this manuscript.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.