Eye-Tracking Technology for Inclusive Assessment of Reading Difficulties in Children and Adolescents with Diverse Neurodevelopmental Profiles: A Systematic Review of Recent Evidence (2021–2026)
Overall, eye tracking may complement inclusive reading assessment, but wider educational use requires stronger standardization, validation, and practical classroom guidance.
Abstract
Reading difficulties are not limited to developmental dyslexia. They can also affect children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), prematurity-related vulnerabilities, broader reading disabilities, and other neurodevelopmental profiles. This systematic review examined how eye-tracking technology has been used to investigate and assess reading difficulties in these groups, with a focus on inclusive assessment, early identification, and individualized support. Following PRISMA 2020, searches were conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and ERIC for studies published between 2021 and 2026. Eligibility criteria were structured using the PICO framework. After deduplication and eligibility screening, 80 reports representing 72 review study-level units met the inclusion criteria. Most focused on developmental dyslexia, although ADHD, ASD, prematurity-related difficulties, broader reading disabilities, and mixed profiles were also represented. Common findings included longer fixation durations, more fixations and regressions, reduced perceptual span, altered scanpaths, and lower reading efficiency. Some studies also used machine learning for screening or classification. Overall, eye tracking may complement inclusive reading assessment, but wider educational use requires stronger standardization, validation, and practical classroom guidance.
The overall evidence supports a broad pattern of lower motor competence in ASD, and the importance of early motor assessment and targeted intervention in clinical and educational contexts is reinforced.
N. Blanco-Martínez, D. González-Devesa, Silvia Varela et al.· Autism Research· 0 citations
There is a critical need for consensus guidelines on ASD assessment practices for people with cerebral palsy and other EOMC, as well as for validated screening and diagnostic tools.
O. Laporta-Hoyos, M. Fernández-Andújar, Lee B. Reid et al.· Developmental Medicine & Chi...· 1 citation
Background: Inclusive educational assessment requires tools that capture how learners with diverse cognitive profiles engage with tasks. This study examines whether a game-based, gaze-contingent eye-tracking task can generate relevant indicators for inclusive assessment of autistic children and children with dyslexia....
The available evidence suggests a partially overlapping structural language phenotype between children with ASD and co-occurring language impairment (ASD-LI and those with DLD, while also highlighting important disorder-specific characteristics.
Irine Doghadze, T. Gagoshidze· Frontiers in Psychology· 1 citation
It is highlighted that even with typical intellectual abilities, children with ASD-L1 have significant difficulties in controlling automatic responses to achieve behavioral or cognitive goals (inhibition), and insights into the cognitive profile of children with Level 1 ASD are provided.
Marziyeh Rahimi, Saeid Sadeghi, Mohammad Kiani et al.· Applied neuropsychology. Chi...· 0 citations
PURPOSE
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) affects around 2.8% of the population, yet early diagnosis remains challenging and may delay beneficial interventions. Atypical sensory processing and feeding difficulties are frequently reported in ASD and have been discussed as early behavioral correlates. We conducted a systema...
Krisztina Szalkay, Dorottya Gergő, T. Kói et al.· Journal of Autism and Develo...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.