Skip to content

Construting Reverse Thinking: Developing Large Language Models'Reverse Thingking Ability

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 53 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Experimental results show that the proposed backward reasoning pattern construction method significantly improves reasoning efficiency and accuracy in tasks such as mathematical proofs, offering a flexible and efficient reasoning paradigm for solving complex problems.

Abstract

When facing complex problems, humans tend to try various ideas for different issues. Human thinking patterns exhibit remarkable flexibility in adapting to diverse scenarios. GPT-o1, GPT-o3, and DeepSeek-R1 adopt long chain-of-thought models to address complex problems by increasing reasoning depth, which default to a forward reasoning mode. We conducted statistical analysis on the accuracy of different mathematical problem datasets on models of different scales, and found five reasons for errors: Insufficient solution-space coverage, Computational mistakes, Unverified assumptions, Ignoring constraint conditions, Maximum response length limitation. To address the above issues, we proposed a backward reasoning pattern construction method aimed at enhancing the model's reverse thinking ability and dynamic adaptability. First, we constructed an easy-hard two-stage Math dataset for training large models and gradually improving their inference ability at different difficulty levels. The dataset contains forward reasoning paths as well as backward reasoning paths. And a two-stage supervised fine-tuning process is applied to progressively train the model's backward reasoning capability. Furthermore, a fine-grained reward mechanism is developed, employing smoothed reward signals to strengthen the model's ability to autonomously select thinking modes during the reasoning process, thereby avoiding reward hacking. A linear-decay balanced sampling strategy is designed to maintain a balance between forward and backward reasoning path samples during training, enabling the model to converge quickly and stably. Experimental results show that our method significantly improves reasoning efficiency and accuracy in tasks such as mathematical proofs, offering a flexible and efficient reasoning paradigm for solving complex problems.

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

INSPIRE: An Internalize-Then-Improve Approach for Example-Driven Mathematical Reasoning

INSPIRE is an Internalize-Then-Improve approach combining Reference-Guided Student Internalization (RGSI), which produces high-quality preference candidates under the policy model's own distribution, with a stage-wise rubric preference training strategy that decomposes learning into method-oriented and correctness-orie...

Shuai Wang, Jiayi Kuang, Ying-Hui Li et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Not All Thinking is Created Equal: Latent Reasoning Discovers a Recurrent Search Algorithm for Depth Generalization

Large Language Models can perform multi-step reasoning and improve task performance through different forms of intermediate computation, from token-based traces to computation carried out in latent space. However, a question remains open: do these different forms of thinking rely on the same underlying mechanism? To ad...

Hu-Zi Cheng, Zhe-Wei Zhang · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

Rethinking Thinking Steps in Overthinking: Towards More Effective Reasoning

This work proposes a training-free, interpretable framework that selects thinking words via attention heads to guide LRMs toward more effective reasoning, and consistently outperforms the strong baseline DEER.

De-Zhi Zhao, Xin Liu, Xiao-Cheng Feng et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Thinking effort aligns between humans and reasoning models in abductive reasoning

This work isolates abductive reasoning from deductive reasoning: unlike deductive tasks, its difficulty cannot be inferred from formal structure and offers no shortcuts a model could exploit to mimic effort without genuine search, providing firmer ground for empirical claims of shared effort.

Henry Arthur · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Ladders of Thought: A Self-Evolving Curriculum of Progressively Simplified Reasoning Traces

Evaluated on two reasoning domains, math and multi-hop reasoning, across 1-8B models from different families, LoT consistently improves over KD and converges faster than staged curricula, highlighting the value of adaptive progression.

Ming-Hui Liu, Thomas Magelinski, De-Hao Yuan et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.