Sep 2026· AI and Ethics· Vol 6· 0 citations· 39 references
TL;DR
It is concluded that, while AI may be considered a valuable tool for supporting human moral deliberation, it cannot by itself serve as an expert moral decision-maker.
The Stoic concept of the hegemonikon—the capacity for assent that directs the mind—is used as a framework for understanding intellectual creation and decision-making, clarifying when AI supports human judgment and when it replaces decision-making authority.
Christos A. Koutsotasios, Elias Vavouras· Dianoesis· 0 citations
The article argues that many contemporary AI alignment practices risk a mistaken assimilation of moral agency to statistical learning. Techniques such as reinforcement learning from human feedback and constitutional AI often treat morality as a behavioral function that can be approximated from human discourse, behavior...
An ethics of non-agentive AI is sketched: the authors should see these systems as powerful, instrument-like extensions of human cognition, not as knowers in their own right, and design institutions, interfaces and norms of trust accordingly.
Neumann Saskia Janina· Digital Society· 0 citations
As LLMs take on roles requiring moral advice, understanding how they attribute moral agency becomes critical. Humans possess moral agency, the capacity to make ethically guided decisions and bear responsibility for their consequences, a well-established construct in moral psychology. Yet as artificial agents (AAs) such...
F. Mansilla, Aloysius Y. F. Tok, B. Guellaï et al.· 0 citations
Calls for “trustworthy AI” have become ubiquitous in policy and industry, yet the term remains conceptually underspecified. In earlier work (Dorsch & Deroy, 2024), we argued that moral trustworthiness is neither possible nor necessary for AI decision-support systems (AI-DSS), and indeed unethical to pursue, since it ri...
John Dorsch, Maximilian Moll, Ophélia Deroy· Philosophy & Technology· 0 citations
It is found that at least for the time being, explicit normative instructions are not fully able to realign AI advice with the normative convictions of the population, or the legislator deciding on its behalf.
Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.