Skip to content
Review Open access

Polymer Composite Design Strategies for Antibacterial Resin-Based Dental Restorative Composites: Mechanisms, Structure–Property Relationships, and Translational Challenges

Sep 2026 · Polymers · Vol 18 · 0 citations · 67 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The evidence indicates that durable antibacterial performance cannot be considered independently of polymerization, mechanical integrity, aging stability, and biocompatibility, and future development should therefore prioritize clinically relevant multispecies biofilm models, standardized aging protocols, structure–property analysis, and long-term in vivo and clinical validation.

Abstract

Dental resin composites are widely used for direct restorations, yet their longevity remains limited by biofilm accumulation and secondary caries at the tooth–restoration interface. Unlike previous reviews that have primarily organized antibacterial dental materials according to antimicrobial agents or mechanisms, this narrative review evaluates antibacterial resin composites from a polymer-composite design perspective, integrating molecular architecture, network immobilization, filler–matrix interactions, polymerization, and aging. Leachable agents such as chlorhexidine provide early antibacterial effects but are constrained by reservoir depletion, water sorption, and release-related material changes. In contrast, covalently immobilized quaternary ammonium monomers provide sustained surface-associated activity without continuous release, although their performance depends on molecular structure, concentration, degree of conversion, and network properties. Antibacterial nanoparticles and bioactive glass fillers provide composition-dependent ion-mediated, photocatalytic, pH-modulating, and remineralizing effects, while their performance depends strongly on particle characteristics, dispersion, and formulation. Multifunctional systems further combine antibacterial activity with protein repellence, mineral protection, and rechargeable ion release. Overall, the evidence indicates that durable antibacterial performance cannot be considered independently of polymerization, mechanical integrity, aging stability, and biocompatibility. Future development should therefore prioritize clinically relevant multispecies biofilm models, standardized aging protocols, structure–property analysis, and long-term in vivo and clinical validation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jan 2026

Current Developments in Antibacterial Nanoparticle–Based Dental Composite Materials: A Comprehensive Overview

The persistence of secondary caries, biofilm accumulation, and hybrid layer degradation as leading causes of failure in resin‐based composite (RBC) restorations underscores the urgent need for materials that can effectively prevent demineralization and promote the remineralization of dental hard tissues. Conventional c...

Athulya Mullappally, Vishnu Vijay Kumar, Arpitha G. R. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Bioactive Glass in Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics: A Comprehensive Review

Bioactive glass represents a cornerstone in biomimetic dentistry and regenerative endodontics and ongoing materials innovation may redefine future therapeutic standards.

S. Lata, Saumyakanta Mohanty, Priyanka Sarangi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Self-Healing Dental Biomaterials: From Early Polymer Concepts to the Era of Sustainability and Artificial Intelligence – A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms and Future Applications

The clinical lifespan of traditional resin-based dental restorations remains limited to 6–10 years, primarily due to mechanical fatigue, secondary caries, and interfacial degradation, necessitating frequent replacements that compromise tooth structure and generate substantial environmental waste. This comprehensive rev...

Ali Cafcouf · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Characterization of Dental Composite Resin with Additional TiO 2 Nanoparticle Filler

This work characterized composite resins using silicon dioxide filler as the main constituent, along with titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) as supplementary additives, and showed that composite I has the highest degree of conversion and Vickers hardness values, while composite II shows the lowest shrinkage volume.

Siti Fauziyah Rahman, Yori Rachmia Riva, E. S. Yulianti et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Electrospun Polymeric Composites for Dental Tissue Engineering: Materials, Fabrication Strategies, Biological Performance, and Clinical Translation

This review brings together the electrospinning literature related to dental applications and explores the natural, synthetic, and composite polymer systems used to produce dental nanofibers and their applications in periodontal regeneration, alveolar bone repair, dentin-pulp regeneration, antibacterial and drug delive...

Nisha Shetty, C. N., Sampath Suranjan Salins et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Green-synthesized nanoparticles for glass ionomer cement reinforcement: a systematic review of their antimicrobial, mechanical, and physicochemical properties

This systematic review critically evaluates the antimicrobial performance, mechanical properties, and fluoride release of glass ionomer cements (GICs) modified exclusively with green-synthesized nanoparticles. The review highlights how eco-friendly nanoparticle production influences material behavior and clinical appli...

M. Mohamed, Hager Fawzy, Shahd Mahmoud et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.