Sep 2026· Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology· Vol 19, pp. 4268· 0 citations· 65 references
TL;DR
Bioactive glass represents a cornerstone in biomimetic dentistry and regenerative endodontics and ongoing materials innovation may redefine future therapeutic standards.
Abstract
Bioactive glass (BAG) has become an innovative silica-based dental material that is capable of regulating biological reactions at the interfaces of hard and soft tissues. Bioactive glass has changed from being a bone-bonding implant material to a dental biomaterial that may be used in restorative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology and regenerative treatments. On the other hand, BAG undergoes surface-mediated ionic dissolution in physiological fluids, which leads to the creation of hydroxycarbonate apatite (HCA). This HCA chemically integrates with mineralized tissues. Modern changes include ion replacement, alkali-free formulations, nanoparticle engineering, mesoporous designs and drug-loading methods, which have greatly increased its ability to work. Current review analysis looks closely at the physicochemical foundation, synthesis methods, structural categorization and mechanistic pathways that explain bioactive glass bioactivity. It combines new data with antibiotic and antimicrobial behavior, immunomodulatory potential, remineralization kinetics and role in tissue regeneration. We also look at how well adhesive systems, dentifrices, restorative composites, pulp capping materials, intracanal medicaments, obturation systems and root canal sealers work in the lab and in the long term. Limitations including brittleness, strength degradation at high filler loading and insufficient longitudinal clinical trials are discussed. Finally, future translational directions including smart ion-releasing systems, injectable scaffolds, peptide-functionalized particles and regenerative endodontic constructs are explored. So, bioactive glass represents a cornerstone in biomimetic dentistry and regenerative endodontics and ongoing materials innovation may redefine future therapeutic standards.
A paradigm shift in restorative dentistry is taking place from passive
replacement of lost tooth structure to biologically integrated, biomimetic and
digitally engineered restorative solutions. This is a narrative review of the
changing face of current restorative dentistry, from a holistic standpoint of
bioactive mate...
Sushil Giri, Anuradha Singh, Janey Alam et al.· European Journal of Prosthod...· 0 citations
The evidence indicates that durable antibacterial performance cannot be considered independently of polymerization, mechanical integrity, aging stability, and biocompatibility, and future development should therefore prioritize clinically relevant multispecies biofilm models, standardized aging protocols, structure–pro...
Bioactive restorative materials mark an important shift in restorative dentistry, moving beyond the replacement of lost tooth structure to materials that actively interact with dental tissues and the oral environment. This narrative review examined evidence published between 2021 and 2026 on ion release, remineralizati...
Zavielis Maldonado Zavielis Maldonado, Kennard William Vandergrift Kennard William Vandergrift, Yerennis Campaneria Yerennis Campaneria et al.· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
Abstract The concept of bioactivity in restorative dentistry has evolved beyond the traditional expectation of inert materials designed solely to replace lost tooth structure. Contemporary restorative systems are increasingly engineered to interact with the dentin-pulp complex by modulating mineral dynamics, matrix sta...
I. P. M. Soares, Maria Luiza Barucci Araújo Pires, Juliana Rios de Oliveira et al.· Brazilian Oral Research· 1 citation
This article analyzes, on the basis of contemporary scientific evidence, the biological interaction of modern adhesive systems used in prosthodontics with dental hard tissues, the dentin–pulp complex, and oral soft tissues. The effects of functional monomers, particularly 10-MDP, HEMA, Bis-GMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA, in uni...
M. I. Umarxojayeva· Journal of modern medicine· 0 citations
This work characterized composite resins using silicon dioxide filler as the main constituent, along with titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) as supplementary additives, and showed that composite I has the highest degree of conversion and Vickers hardness values, while composite II shows the lowest shrinkage volume.
Siti Fauziyah Rahman, Yori Rachmia Riva, E. S. Yulianti et al.· Macromolecular Symposia· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.