Skip to content

Striatal interneuron microcircuits gate reinforcement to stabilize adaptive choice

Sep 2026 · bioRxiv · 0 citations
Biology Medicine

Abstract

The dorsomedial striatum guides learning and adaptive decision-making through excitatory synaptic control of its spiny projection neuron outputs. However, the contributions of local inhibitory microcircuitry remain poorly understood. Here, we identify an interneuron circuit in the dorsomedial striatum that links outcome processing to adaptive action selection. During probabilistic push-pull reversal learning, interneurons represented immediate outcomes: somatostatin interneurons were recruited on unrewarded trials and unexpected rewarded trials, whereas tyrosine hydroxylase interneurons were suppressed on unrewarded trials and recruited on rewarded trials. In vivo recruitment of tyrosine hydroxylase interneurons suppressed somatostatin interneuron activity and increased activity in both direct- and indirect-pathway striatal projection neurons, revealing a polysynaptic disinhibitory microcircuit. Transient inhibition of somatostatin interneurons in this pull-tuned region produced a sustained increase in aberrant pull choices and occupancy of a suboptimal pull-preferring behavioral state, whereas inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase interneurons produced a sustained impairment of pull reinforcement. Longer-term policy changes following somatostatin interneuron inhibition coincided with postsynaptic potentiation of excitatory synapses onto striatal projection neurons, suggesting a potential substrate for the persistence of altered behavioral policies. Together, these findings identify a disinhibitory striatal circuit motif gating reinforcement which transforms individual trial outcomes into temporally broader policy. Highlights Local striatal interneurons transform outcome signals into action-specific reinforcement. Tyrosine hydroxylase interneurons disinhibit striatal projection neurons through somatostatin interneurons. Transient interneuron inhibition drives persistent, opponent shifts in action policy. Somatostatin interneuron inhibition couples altered policy to excitatory synaptic potentiation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.