Sep 2026· Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine· 0 citations· 36 references
TL;DR
Concomitant elevation of Lp(a) and platelet count identifies a subgroup of individuals at substantially higher risk for MACE, and the observed potential benefit of aspirin in the double-high subgroup is exploratory and warrants further prospective investigation.
Abstract
Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increased platelet count independently predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), yet their interplay and joint value in cardiovascular risk stratification remain incompletely elucidated. We examined their separate and joint associations with incident MACE, with a secondary exploratory analysis of whether preventive benefit from aspirin differs across biomarker-defined subgroups.
We included 250,927 participants free of prior cardiovascular disease (CVD) from the UK Biobank (enrolled 2006–2010). Participants were categorized into four groups based on Lp(a) status (elevated: >125 nmol/L) and platelet count (increased: upper tertile, >273 × 10
9
/L). Multivariable Cox regression was applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for MACE, adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, metabolic and medication-related covariates. Formal tests for additive and multiplicative interactions were performed. Over a median follow-up of 13.4 years, both elevated Lp(a) (HR 1.250; 95% CI 1.118–1.325) and increased platelet count (HR 1.056; 95% CI 1.005–1.110) were independently associated with higher MACE risk. Participants with concurrent elevation of both biomarkers carried the highest MACE risk (HR 1.391; 95% CI 1.256–1.541). Neither additive nor multiplicative interaction reached statistical significance, indicating that the joint effect reflects additive risk accumulation rather than biological synergy. In exploratory subgroup analyses, aspirin use was associated with lower MACE risk only in the double-high subgroup, but not in those with isolated elevated Lp(a).
Concomitant elevation of Lp(a) and platelet count identifies a subgroup of individuals at substantially higher risk for MACE. The observed potential benefit of aspirin in the double-high subgroup is exploratory and warrants further prospective investigation.
AIMS
The relative contributions of inflammatory and atherogenic lipoprotein pathways to residual cardiovascular risk remain unclear. We examined the joint and independent associations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality.
METHODS
Among 34,06...
P. Cheon, J. McParland, Sean Doherty et al.· Progress in cardiovascular d...· 1 citation
Background/Objectives: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined, largely stable risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and guidelines recommend at least one measurement during adulthood. Whether intra-individual change in Lp(a) between repeated measurements carries prognostic information beyo...
Mi-Na Kim, Dongkuk Kim, S. Hong et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
Aims Metabolic dysfunction, inflammation, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] reflect different biomarker domains associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. We examined the individual and joint associations of the triglyceride–glucose (TyG) index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and Lp(a)...
Guan-Lin Chen, Yu-Long Lan, Dan Wu et al.· Frontiers in Endocrinology· 0 citations
Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], is leading risk factor for premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Multi-societal guidelines recommend to test Lp(a) amongst adults at least once, however, real-world testing data in primary prevention populations remains scarce. Objectives: To investigate the utilization o...
R. Awan, H. Wang, F. Thoma et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a causal cardiovascular risk factor, yet its association with incident ischemic stroke in routine clinical care remains uncertain. Adults in the TriNetX US Collaborative Network with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL were compared with those having Lp(a) <50 mg/dL after 1:1 propensity score matching. A...
Emerging evidence links Lp(a) to atrial fi brillation, broadening its clinical relevance and integrating Lp(a) testing into risk assessment and preparing for targeted therapies are critical steps in modern cardiovas-cular prevention.
L. Kopaleishvili, T. Chkhaidze, S. Ungiadze et al.· Bulgarian Cardiology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.