Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

FedEdgeR: federated and privacy-preserving edgeR for differential gene expression analysis

Sep 2026 · bioRxiv · 0 citations · 31 references
Biology Medicine

TL;DR

FedEdgeR is presented, a federated edgeR implementation protected by secure multi-party computation (SMPC), covering IRLS GLM fitting, three-level dispersion estimation, and the likelihood-ratio test, which consistently outperforms Fisher, Stouffer, random-effects, and RankProd meta-analysis on every tested dataset.

Abstract

Motivation Multi-center RNA-seq studies improve statistical power, but privacy regulations restrict patient-level data sharing. Meta-analysis methods avoid this restriction but lose power, especially under per-site imbalance. Federated learning allows sites to share only summary statistics. Among the three dominant differential expression (DE) frameworks, Flimma federates limma-voom and FedPyDESeq2 federates DESeq2. edgeR, still preferred for small-sample and high-variability designs, lacks a federated counterpart. Its iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) and Cox-Reid dispersion estimation make federation harder than limma-voom’s single-pass fit. Results We present FedEdgeR, a federated edgeR implementation protected by secure multi-party computation (SMPC), covering IRLS GLM fitting, three-level dispersion estimation, and the likelihood-ratio test. We evaluate it on four representative RNA-seq datasets: two tumor/normal cohorts, a multi-cohort anti-PD-1 immunotherapy study, and a 6-sample paired stress-test. FedEdgeR matches pooled edgeR under various metrics, such as Pearson r ≥ 0.99999 on − log10 p-values, 100% complete top-100 DE gene overlap, and F1 = 1.000 at the nominal FDR level 0.05. It consistently outperforms Fisher, Stouffer, random-effects, and RankProd meta-analysis on every tested dataset. Availability Source code is archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20450301. Contact zhiwei@njit.edu

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.