Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
TL;DR
These findings describe concurrent adjusted associations rather than temporal or causal pathways and should be interpreted in light of the weak measurement structure of the AI-literacy instrument in this sample.
Abstract
Self-reported artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and AI anxiety may be associated with how future speech-language therapists evaluate AI, but evidence specific to this population is limited.
This cross-sectional survey examined the independent associations of the observed self-reported AI-literacy composite and AI anxiety with positive and negative attitudes toward AI among 313 fourth-year undergraduate speech-language therapy students from 24 departments in Türkiye. The two dimensions of the General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale were analysed separately. Multiple regression models adjusted for age, gender, frequency of AI use, self-directed AI learning, and clinical-purpose AI use; standard errors were clustered by department, and wild cluster bootstrap inference was used.
The observed self-reported AI-literacy composite was associated with more positive attitudes (B = 0.433, β = 0.373,
p
< .001), whereas AI anxiety was not. AI anxiety was associated with more negative attitudes (B = − 0.624, β = −0.674,
p
< .001), whereas the observed composite was not. Clinical-purpose AI use showed a smaller association with less negative attitudes (B = 0.148, β = 0.121, bootstrap
p
= .003); the self-directed-learning estimate was inconclusive. The two focal associations remained consistent in direction and statistical interpretation and were broadly similar in magnitude across sensitivity analyses.
These findings describe concurrent adjusted associations rather than temporal or causal pathways and should be interpreted in light of the weak measurement structure of the AI-literacy instrument in this sample.
The findings suggest that the quantity of AI use and learners’ competency to understand, evaluate, and self-regulate AI use are empirically distinct indicators that universities should measure separately.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) voice tools create low-risk opportunities for second-language (L2) speaking practice, but it remains unclear whether AI-assisted speaking practice is associated with human-directed communicative readiness and how this relationship varies across learners and evaluation contexts...
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools have been found to influence English language learning. However, there is scant research on the role of AI literacy in learners' psycho-affective states. To address the gap, our study examines the longitudinal co-development of AI literacy, learner agency, foreign language enjoyment,...
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools have become part of everyday coursework for university students, yet the emotional and motivational conditions under which these tools support or undermine learning remain poorly understood. Drawing on the control-value theory of achievement emotions, this study examine...
Hui-Juan Qin, Kun Liu· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
ABSTRACT Objective Generative artificial intelligence is now embedded in university learning, but the psychological pathways linking AI literacy with AI dependence remain unclear. This study examined whether AI self-efficacy and academic procrastination mediate the association between AI literacy and AI dependence amon...
Hou-Yu Wu, Haiyan Ni, Jia-Qi He et al.· Australian journal of psycho...· 0 citations
University students’ adoption of generative artificial intelligence has become nearly universal, yet institutional guidance has not kept pace, leaving responsible use dependent on students’ own self-regulation. Drawing on social cognitive theory, this study examined whether self-regulated learning accounts for the asso...
Sandra Lizzette León Luyo, Heyner Yuliano Marquez-Yauri, Christian David Corrales Otazú et al.· European Journal of Investig...· 0 citations
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.