This systematic review examines how artificial intelligence methods are being applied to ECG-based cardiovascular disease prediction, with particular attention to data handling practices, modeling approaches, interpretability techniques, and evaluation strategies, to accelerate the development of reliable, fair, and clinically useful AI systems for cardiovascular care.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases continue to be the leading cause of death globally, creating an urgent need for accurate and scalable diagnostic approaches. The electrocardiogram remains essential for cardiac assessment, yet the growing demand for expert interpretation places increasing strain on healthcare systems and introduces potential diagnostic variability. This systematic review examines how artificial intelligence methods are being applied to ECG-based cardiovascular disease prediction, with particular attention to data handling practices, modeling approaches, interpretability techniques, and evaluation strategies. The review aims to provide researchers with a comprehensive understanding of the field’s current state while identifying persistent challenges and opportunities for meaningful progress. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and other major databases for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2020 and November 2025. After screening 1247 records, 83 high-quality studies met our inclusion criteria and underwent rigorous quality assessment using a customized evaluation tool addressing data sources, preprocessing, model development, and clinical applicability. The analysis reveals that while deep learning approaches—particularly convolutional neural networks and hybrid architectures—have demonstrated impressive performance in controlled settings, significant gaps remain. Only 38.6% of studies showed low risk of bias, with external validation lacking in 72% of cases. Dataset diversity remains problematic, with 78% of data originating from North America or Europe and minimal representation of pediatric populations. Explainable AI methods appear in only 52% of recent studies, and demographic fairness assessments remain rare. This review provides a structured roadmap for researchers navigating the entire AI-ECG pipeline, from data acquisition through model deployment. By systematically identifying methodological gaps and proposing concrete solutions, we aim to accelerate the development of reliable, fair, and clinically useful AI systems for cardiovascular care.
Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram interpretation shows strongest support for arrhythmia detection and automated ECG classification, while structural disease screening and prognostic modeling remain promising but less mature.
Mohamed Elhussain, Esra M. Abdalla, Ragda Ali et al.· BMC Cardiovascular Disorders· 0 citations
AI models show strong diagnostic accuracy for CAD across both modalities, although external validation was limited and applied in a minority of studies, however, the widespread methodological bias means these tools should currently support clinical decision-making rather than replace standard diagnostic methods.
Ahmad Ibrahim Alshdaifat, W. Balachandran, Ziad Hunaiti· AI in Medicine· 0 citations
For HF/LVSD, AI-ECG shows consistent and reproducible accuracy against echocardiography, and this estimate proved robust to the exclusion of studies at high risk of bias.
Joshuan J. Barboza, Óscar Andrés Ramírez-Terán, E. Tomás-Alvarado et al.· Diagnostics· 0 citations
The application of AI to ECG analysis represents a promising advancement in personalized cardiovascular risk assessment, but further research is needed to ensure the safety, effectiveness, and equitable clinical integration of these technologies.
Maria Clara Mantoan Pinheiro, L. Felberg, I. Bozzi et al.· Arquivos Brasileiros de Card...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to convert heterogeneous clinical data into actionable predictions across chronic disease pathways, yet the maturity and clinical role of AI differ substantially among diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. This structured comparative evidence synthesis eva...
Reshmi Gopalakrishnan· Natural Resources for Human...· 0 citations
AI/ML models show promise for predicting CV adverse events in patients with cancer; however, clinical applicability is constrained by insufficient preprocessing transparency, limited external validation, and inadequate calibration reporting.
Li-Wei Wu, Minh-Anh Le-Dang, B. Okoye et al.· Expert review of pharmacoeco...· 0 citations
Exploring how generative AI could make machine vision more accessible to businesses. The post GenEye in a Box: Making Machine Vision Something You Can Just Ask For appeared first on GPT-Lab.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026