In an interconnected world, societies are exposed to risks that transcend boundaries of sectors, regions, and hazards, triggering cascading and compounding impacts across components of the system. Risks of this nature, which can disrupt the functioning of the entire system and challenge its foundations of resilience, have been characterized as “systemic risks” (Sillmann et al., 2022). Conventional modelling, assessment, and risk governance tools are designed to address well-defined, localized, univariate and linear risks. As a result, they are insufficient and often inappropriate for capturing the dynamics and interactions that underlie systemic risks. Disciplinary silos and limited integration across domains also hinder the development of tools for systemic risk analysis, while issues of data interoperability, the selection of appropriate indicators, and a lack of feedback from practitioners further limit their usability in decision-making contexts (Sillmann et al., 2026a). A new scientific agenda and approach, one that is inter- and transdisciplinary, collaborative and co-productive, is needed to fill these gaps. The need for improvement spans establishing methodological advancements to better capture the complexity and uncertainty of systemic risks, improving the interoperability of data and models, and ensuring user engagement to enable user uptake and strengthen legitimacy.
Systemic risk research has emerged as a rapidly expanding field, motivated by the increasing interconnectedness and complexity of global socio-ecological, technological, and economic systems. Here we highlight that systemic risk differs fundamentally from conventional risk: it is characterized by multi-scale interactio...
J. Sillmann, Josipa Županić, Aiswarya Thazhissery Pavanan et al.· IOP Conference Series: Earth...· 0 citations
Systemic risks are increasingly recognized as a defining challenge for contemporary societies, yet research and governance efforts remain fragmented across disciplines, sectors, and institutions. Existing approaches often rely on domain-specific definitions, probabilistic models, or case-based analyses that limit compa...
Paul Einhäupl, P. Schweizer· IOP Conference Series: Earth...· 1 citation
This paper presents a framework for the communication of systemic risk. The framework is termed ‘deliberative’ to highlight two qualities the article argues are necessary for robust systemic risk communication: its participatory nature, which draws in diverse actors across disciplines and communities, and its reciproca...
Benjamin Hofbauer, Raquel Guimaraes, P. Schweizer et al.· IOP Conference Series: Earth...· 1 citation
The Systemic Risk Conference, held in Hamburg in September 2025, was organized within the framework of The Human-Tech Nexus (The HuT) EU project. The event congregated a diverse range of international experts, from researchers and practitioners to policy and decision makers engaged with the systemic risks associated wi...
Abstract The advancement of the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) agenda has increased the complexity of organizational risk management, while the literature remains fragmented across materiality, risk analysis, governance, value chain, and disclosure practices, hindering integrated and decision-oriented appr...
Andreia Drozda Muncinelli, E. D. de Lima, Gianfranco Muncinelli· Cadernos EBAPE.BR· 0 citations
This study contributes to global risk analysis by providing a structural and exploratory enhancement to the analytical framework used to interpret the World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report (GRR), particularly the 2024 edition. It explores the complex interactions among critical global and regional risks using inte...