Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to image-based and image-formatted geoscientific evidence across mineral exploration, from regional and surface surveys to drilling/core analysis and laboratory characterization. However, the literature remains distributed across different research communities, making it difficult to compare how visual evidence, AI tasks, methodological choices, and geological outputs relate across exploration contexts. This systematic mapping review searched the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore for English-language journal articles published between 2016 and 2026. Of 397 identified records, 91 studies were retained after deduplication, screening, and full-text assessment. The studies were mapped across exploration contexts, visual-data domains, AI visual tasks, methodological paradigms, and geological outputs. Regional and surface survey data dominate the evidence base, while drilling/core and laboratory imaging remain less represented. Classification is the most frequent visual task, and CNN-based models remain the dominant methodological paradigm, with hybrid and emerging architectures forming the next major group. The evidence does not indicate a single architecture that is uniformly suitable across mineral-exploration settings; model choice depends on input structure, required geological output, labeled-data availability, and spatial scale. Multisource integration can combine complementary evidence, but differences in spatial support, annotation, sensing conditions, and validation design continue to limit direct comparison and cross-region generalization. Future progress requires more traceable public resources, geographically independent validation, and more systematic integration of complementary geological evidence.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...
A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.
Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al.· arXiv.org· 109 citations· ⚡8
This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.
Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al.· arXiv.org· 109 citations· ⚡19
Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.
Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al.· arXiv.org· 73 citations· ⚡4
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.