A modular biomarker framework integrating genomic, functional, immune‐context, spatial and dynamic readouts to guide patient selection, treatment adaptation, and precision therapeutic decision‐making is proposed.
Abstract
ABSTRACT The DNA damage response (DDR) is increasingly recognized not only as a genome‐maintenance network and source of synthetic‐lethal vulnerabilities, but also as a regulator of tumor immunity. DDR defects and pharmacologic inhibition can increase neoantigen formation, generate micronuclei and cytosolic nucleic acids, activate cGAS–STING, DNA‐PK–NF‐κB, and ERV‐driven RIG‐I/MDA5–MAVS signaling, and alter antigen presentation and immune checkpoint expression. However, the same processes may also promote chronic interferon tolerance, PD‐L1 induction, lymphocyte stress, myeloid suppression, extracellular cGAMP degradation, stromal exclusion, and treatment resistance. This review frames DDR targeting around damage‐to‐immunity conversion, asking when DNA damage becomes a productive antitumor immune signal and when it does not. We summarize targetable DDR modules across cancer types, examine tumor‐intrinsic and host‐cell sensing mechanisms, and discuss antigen‐processing defects, STING regulation, and microenvironmental barriers that shape divergent outcomes. We further review PARP, ATR, WEE1, ATM, and DNA‐PK inhibitor combinations with immunotherapy and other treatment modalities, emphasizing clinical evidence, scheduling, and host‐cell toxicity. Finally, we propose a modular biomarker framework integrating genomic, functional, immune‐context, spatial and dynamic readouts to guide patient selection, treatment adaptation, and precision therapeutic decision‐making.
This review summarizes the major DDR pathways, their roles in tumor evolution and immune remodeling, and the rationale and limitations of combining DDR-targeted therapies with immunotherapy and discusses biomarker refinement, resistance mechanisms, and future strategies for translating genomic stress into durable antit...
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a major genomic feature of several malignancies and provides a therapeutic rationale for DNA-damaging agents and PARP inhibitors. Beyond its role in genome instability, accumulating evidence suggests that HRD also reshapes the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, the immun...
Yi-Ting Yang, Yu-Jia Yin, Sheng-Xin Rong et al.· Cancer Metastasis Review· 0 citations
By integrating DDT inhibition with biomarkers like homologous recombination deficiency and tumor mutational burden, this work can drive synthetic lethality, sensitize tumors to genotoxic agents, suppress treatment-induced mutagenesis, and potentially enhance responses to immunotherapy.
Audesh Bhat, G. Lahane, R. Pandita et al.· Trends in Cancer· 0 citations
Radiotherapy can convert local tumor injury into systemic antitumor immunity, but this effect depends less on the nominal mode of cell death than on the tissue state that follows irradiation. This narrative review reframes radiation-induced regulated cell death around four functional outputs: antigen preservation, prod...
Xiao-Dong Wang, Wei-Yi Gao, Qian-Qian Wang et al.· Cancer Letters· 0 citations
Synthetic lethality has reshaped oncology, particularly in tumours with defects in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, yet therapeutic strategies centred on canonical DDR targets, including poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR), checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) and Wee1 G2 c...
Mirco Masi, Giulia Varignani, A. Cavalli et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
Replication stress (RS) represents a major vulnerability of cancer cells treated with nucleoside analogs and related antimetabolites; however, tumors frequently acquire tolerance mechanisms that permit survival despite persistent DNA lesions. This review examines molecular determinants of RS tolerance, focusing on huma...