An interpretable, stage-specific framework for identifying EEG biomarkers of insomnia is established and the value of explainable artificial intelligence in advancing the neurophysiological understanding of sleep disturbance is demonstrated.
Abstract
Sleep architecture is characterized by dynamic transitions between non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) stages, each defined by distinct oscillatory signatures. Although quantitative EEG has been widely used to study primary insomnia (PI), reported findings remain inconsistent, partly due to limited consideration of cortical regional differences, sleep-stage specificity, and sex-related variability. This study integrates spectral power analysis with explainable machine learning to provide a comprehensive characterization of neural dynamics in PI. EEG recordings from 100 adults (50 healthy sleepers and 50 PI patients) were analyzed across frontal (F3, F4), central (C3, C4), and occipital (O1, O2) regions. Stage-specific classifiers were developed for NREM and REM using LASSO, random forest, CatBoost and XGBoost models, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were employed to quantify the contribution of each spectral and regional feature to model predictions. Models trained on NREM features demonstrated superior discrimination compared with those trained on REM features, suggesting that slow-wave neural activity captures insomnia-related alterations more reliably than REM dynamics. SHAP analysis identified reduced delta power and elevated beta activity most prominently in central regions as the dominant predictors of PI during NREM sleep. In contrast, REM-based models pointed to prefrontal beta1 and occipital alpha as secondary discriminative features. Sex-stratified analyses further revealed systematically higher spectral power in females and distinct SHAP feature-importance patterns between sexes. Collectively, this work establishes an interpretable, stage-specific framework for identifying EEG biomarkers of insomnia and demonstrates the value of explainable artificial intelligence in advancing the neurophysiological understanding of sleep disturbance.
This study investigated neurophysiological differences between individuals with and without insomnia across sleep stages and sleep discrepancy conditions using electroencephalography (EEG). EEG band powers (Delta, Beta) and entropy metrics (Sample Entropy and Multiscale Sample Entropy) were analyzed from each epoch of...
Joseph T. LeCheminant, D. Kay, Brent Feland et al.· Frontiers in sleep· 0 citations
This work systematically characterize the electrophysiological signatures of prolonged wakefulness using a multi-methodological approach and identifies robust cross-species biomarkers of sleep pressure, potentially enabling personalized chronotherapeutic interventions for psychiatric disorders.
Thomas Kroker, L. Puder, O. Abbasi et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This is the first study to report that AD patients exhibit altered microstate parameters and transition probabilities across sleep stages, and suggests that sleep-stage-resolved microstate analysis may offer a new tool for assessing AD.
Guan-Qun Hu, Yu-Jiao Tong, Ling-Feng Liu et al.· Brain Research Bulletin· 0 citations
Sleep talking (ST) is a parasomnia characterized by the utterance of unaware linguistic activations during sleep. Electrophysiological evidence is scarce, and it remains unclear whether local electroencephalographic (EEG) alterations characterize the sleep of STs outside of parasomnia episodes. Findings from NREM paras...
Elisa Pellegrini, Milena Camaioni, Anastasia Mangiaruga et al.· Journal of Sleep Research· 0 citations
Abstract Sleep disturbances are frequently observed in patients with neurodegenerative diseases, but in vivo evidence linking subcortical sleep–wake structures to sleep phenotypes is limited. We aim to examine associations between MRI-derived measures of subcortical sleep–wake regulating regions and polysomnographic sl...