Q-Target Pretrained Transformers is proposed, which keeps the context-conditioned Transformer architecture but replaces behavior cloning with a Bellman-style Q-target objective, and learns to use rewards and transitions in the context to estimate action values, rather than simply imitating the behavior policy.
Abstract
Existing in-context reinforcement learning methods mainly pretrain Transformers with supervised behavior-prediction objectives. This enables task inference from context, but makes the learned policy strongly depend on the quality of offline actions: when trajectories are weak or suboptimal, imitation itself becomes a biased learning signal. We propose Q-Target Pretrained Transformers (QTPT), which keeps the context-conditioned Transformer architecture but replaces behavior cloning with a Bellman-style Q-target objective. QTPT therefore learns to use rewards and transitions in the context to estimate action values, rather than simply imitating the behavior policy. We theoretically analyze QTPT in stochastic linear bandits and finite-horizon MDPs, showing stronger robustness to data quality than supervised pretraining. Empirically, QTPT improves over supervised behavior prediction on controlled RL benchmarks with random or suboptimal data, and we examine extensions to D4RL Kitchen and AntMaze. Supplementary experiments evaluate backbone robustness, meta-RL comparisons, task-coherent context, and unsupported-action value overestimation. These comparisons distinguish the benefits of Q-target pretraining from the remaining limitations of offline coverage.
Transformers can implement reinforcement-learning algorithms in context, yet how off-policy control emerges within Transformers remains poorly understood. We study Q-learning, a foundational model-free control algorithm that combines off-policy bootstrapping with greedy policy improvement. We prove that a two-layer att...
The findings support on-policy distillation as an effective warmup for agentic RLVR and identify initial reward discovery as a mechanism that can contribute to the observed acceleration.
Yi-Tong Qiao, Tian-Tian He, Lei Liu et al.· 0 citations
The results challenge the view that on-policy rollouts are inherently preferable and show that their value depends critically on the objective, evaluation setting, and optimisation hyperparameters.
Julianna Piskorz, Antonin Berthon, M. van der Schaar· 1 citation
This work introduces Minimal Intervention Reinforcement Learning (MInTRL), which expands the exploration frontier through sparse, local interventions in otherwise on-policy rollouts, and establishes minimal intervention as an effective paradigm for enhancing on-policy RL.
Ming-Yu Chen, Ye-Fan Tao, Gerald Friedland et al.· 1 citation
On-policy reinforcement learning has become a central paradigm for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models. However, its effectiveness is often limited by reward sparsity: when a model fails to discover correct trajectories for difficult problems, the optimization process receives little useful signa...
Hoang Phan, M. Pham, Chau Pham et al.· 0 citations
Reward-Free Policy Optimization (RFPO), which repurposes a single calibrated, frozen critic as a rollout-level reward, a value baseline for generalized advantage estimation, and a success forecaster for unfinished prefixes is introduced.
Hong-Yang Li, Xiao Li, Caesar Wu et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.