Sep 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstract
Preserve the difference, test the organization, reconstruct the effect, and test identity separately. The Rainbow Engineering Program treats cognitive difference as a staged experimental object rather than an assumed property of artificial systems. Grey constructs controlled cognitive architectures; Gold tests whether their differences are experimentally real and epistemically consequential; Blue asks whether validated difference can cross cogniform boundaries without assimilation; and Indigo asks whether preserved difference becomes epistemically productive as qualified cognitive parallax. Violet begins from that completed upstream chain and asks whether qualified cognitive parallax can become more strongly coordinated without erasing the differences that make it productive. The paper introduces a four-level organizational K-ladder—separation, coordinated plurality, partial integration, and candidate synthesis together with explicit preservation, assimilation, mechanism, reconstruction, identity, experimental-priority, cartographic, prediction, and null-decision architectures. Candidate synthesis is reconstruction-relative rather than a claim of ontological irreducibility. Meta-cogniform identity is tested separately through boundary, replacement, suspension/restart, repair, developmental, fork, and merge interventions. Violet is therefore a methodology for organized cognitive difference: it specifies how stronger claims can be earned, withheld, reconstructed, downgraded, or falsified without collapsing performance, organization, and identity into one score. Keywords: Alienficial Syntelligence; Rainbow Engineering Program; cognitive parallax; cogniforms; Translation Without Assimilation; multi-agent cognition; collective intelligence; cognitive ecology; candidate synthesis; meta-cogniform; mechanism; causal intervention; reconstruction; emergence; experimental AI.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...
Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al.· arXiv.org· 121 citations· ⚡9
This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...
This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.
Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al.· arXiv.org· 109 citations· ⚡19
A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.
Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al.· arXiv.org· 109 citations· ⚡8
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.