Skip to content
Open access

Serum Levels of the Proinflammatory Cytokines IL-6, IL-16, IL-18, and IL-36 in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis from the Western Region of Saudi Arabia: Associations with Disease Duration and Disability

Sep 2026 · Neurology International · Vol 18 · 0 citations · 38 references
Medicine

Abstract

Background: Systemic inflammation contributes to the pathobiology of multiple sclerosis (MS), yet serum biomarker data from Middle Eastern populations remain limited. This study evaluated serum levels of IL-6, IL-16, IL-18, and IL-36 in Saudi adults with MS compared with matched healthy controls and examined associations with disease duration, phenotype, treatment, and disability. Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional, matched case–control study enrolled 26 MS patients and 26 age- and sex-matched controls. Serum cytokines were measured by ELISA. Disability was assessed using EDSS and the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW). Matched comparisons used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; subgroup comparisons used Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal–Wallis tests; associations used Spearman’s correlation. Results: No correction for multiple comparisons was applied given the exploratory design. All four interleukins were higher in MS patients than in controls (p < 0.001). Age correlated with EDSS (r = 0.573, p = 0.002) and T25FW (r = 0.464, p = 0.014). Only IL-6 showed a notable correlation with disability, with T25FW (r = 0.53, p = 0.008) and, weaker, EDSS (r = 0.38, p = 0.052); IL-18 showed a weak, non-significant correlation with T25FW (r = 0.35, p = 0.126); IL-16 and IL-36 showed no relevant associations. IL-16 was higher in newly diagnosed than in long-standing cases (p = 0.012); no differences by phenotype or treatment were observed for any marker. Conclusions: Serum IL-6, IL-16, IL-18, and IL-36 were elevated in Saudi MS patients versus controls. IL-6 alone showed a modest, unadjusted association with disability, supporting its evaluation as a candidate biomarker in larger, longitudinal, covariate-adjusted cohorts. These findings are hypothesis-generating and should not be interpreted as evidence of independent or clinically actionable biomarker utility.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.