Skip to content

CAIRN: Dynamic Fact-Intent DAGs for Multi-Agent Exploration

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 25 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

CAIRN is presented, a fact-intent-driven multi-agent paradigm for goal-directed exploration that represents observations and planned investigations as a dynamic directed acyclic graph (DAG) and shows the potential of DAG-guided parallel exploration.

Abstract

LLM-powered autonomous systems have demonstrated promising capabilities in mathematical reasoning, engineering, and cybersecurity. Yet how to organize these systems for effective, reliable, and sustained performance remains an open question. In this paper, we present CAIRN, a fact-intent-driven multi-agent paradigm for goal-directed exploration. CAIRN represents observations and planned investigations as a dynamic directed acyclic graph (DAG). A reasoner interprets facts to propose intents, which workers execute to produce new facts. Each intent references its supporting facts and defines a potential exploration branch. The persistent graph preserves goals, dependencies and findings across workers, supporting knowledge reuse and parallel exploration. The graph also makes execution trajectories traceable and auditable, providing a basis for human verification and intervention. We evaluate CAIRN across cybersecurity and mathematical reasoning tasks, examining task success, time to solution, and token consumption. DAG-based coordination can incur higher token costs with no observable performance gains on tasks that require little effort. However, on high-effort tasks (at least 1M tokens), we observe faster solutions in 76.5% of cases, with speedups of up to 3.08x. Moreover, as task effort increases, these time gains become more pronounced while relative token overhead declines, highlighting the potential of DAG-guided parallel exploration.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

DeReAct: Decomposed Reasoning and Acting for Reliable AI Agents

ReAct-based agents typically rely on a single LLM policy to propose actions, interact with the environment, and decide when a task is complete. This coupling makes action authorization and completion control difficult to enforce independently, allowing errors to propagate and unsupported completion claims to terminate...

Ajay Vohra, Tao Chen, Neeti Narayan et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

DynaHarness: A Dynamic Physical Harness for Self-Evolving Robot Agents

Pretrained robot policies provide useful action priors, but long-horizon manipulation still requires coordination between semantic reasoning and physical execution. Semantic reasoning operates at a coarser timescale than physical interaction, while episode-level failures provide limited guidance on which system compone...

Hao-Yuan Deng, Jie-Bin Liu, Teng-Xiao Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Multi-Agent AI Safety as an Institutional Design Problem

This is the first paper from POLIS, an ongoing research programme studying algorithmic institutions for multi-agent systems, and asks which parts of an AI institution produce safety and how they do it.

X. Abdullah · 1 citation
Book Open access Aug 2026

ATLAS: Discovering Agent Strategies through LLM-Guided Abstraction and Automata Learning

This work presents ATLAS (Automata Learning for Agent Trajectory Analysis and Strategy Discovery), an approach for recovering interpretable behavioral models from agent trajectories that enable systematic understanding and analysis of otherwise opaque AI agents.

Ignacio D. Lopez-Miguel, A. Happe, Jürgen Cito et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Adaptive Influence Graphs for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems

Adaptive Influence Graphs is introduced, a two-stage agentic framework that first transforms a failed trace into a structured graph and then navigates it to identify the critical error and establishes a new state of the art on Who&When, the standard benchmark for multi-agent failure attribution.

Yarden Bakish, Amir Dudai, Roy Ganz et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Preprint Aug 2026

Apodex 1.1: Scaling Agentic Intelligence for Complex Work

Apodex 1.1 reaches the leading performance band despite using a substantially smaller model than many frontier systems, and the 35B-parameter Apodex 1.1 Mini further retains strong working capability in a locally deployable form.

B. An, B. Li, B. Wang et al. · 3 citations · ⚡1

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.