AI Night-Scientist is introduced, an agentic framework that uses reinforcement learning to teach models when and how to depart from predictable reasoning to suggest creativity is a learnable, multi-level ability that can be shaped to help researchers reach ideas beyond those typically explored by LLMs.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) excel at structured, verifiable tasks, but their low-entropy bias can produce homogeneous and predictable outputs, limiting their utility for open-ended scientific ideation. Effective discovery, however, spans a broader creative spectrum: from structured day science to loosely structured, serendipitous night science that reaches ideas beyond those typically considered. We introduce AI Night-Scientist, an agentic framework that uses reinforcement learning to teach models when and how to depart from predictable reasoning. Grounded in cognitive science, we model creativity along three axes: action (what to do and how creatively), process (when to explore versus exploit), and outcome (the novelty and usefulness of the resulting idea). We use these axes to train models with GRPO, exposing them to varying degrees and forms of creativity throughout training. This produces substantially more diverse scientific proposals, expanding the range of research directions by 27.8% and contribution types by 14.9% over the base model. It also improves predicted citation impact by up to 32.0 percentage points and originality by 66.2 points. These gains cannot be reproduced by simply increasing decoding temperature; instead, we find that semantic guidance specifying what kind of creativity to pursue is critical. Overall, our results suggest that creativity is a learnable, multi-level ability that can be shaped to help researchers reach ideas beyond those typically explored by LLMs.
Creativityis often viewed as one of the defining hallmarks of intelligence, yet the mechanisms underlying creative behavior remain poorly understood. This question has become increasingly important as artificial intelligence systems demonstrate remarkable abilities to generate novel text, images, music, and code, raisi...
Lucy L. W. Owen, Ze-Dong Peng, Erik E. Guzik· Knowledge· 0 citations
Many benchmarks track Large Language Model (LLM) performance on tasks with verifiable answers, but less is known about how LLM performance is evolving on open-ended tasks, where creativity, originality and diversity may matter as much as quality. As LLMs increasingly support human ideation and creative work, understand...
Nirav Patel, Josiah Crossman, Eva Aggarwal et al.· 2 citations
This paper examines how generative artificial intelligence (AI) affects both productivity and motivation in creative work. In a randomized experiment, participants were asked to complete two illustration tasks with varying access to a text-to-image AI tool. By recording the production process and evaluating outputs eve...
Yvonne Jie Chen, Jie Gong, Jin Li et al.· 0 citations
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence and how human interact with AIs. Despite impressive advancements, LLMs struggle with complex mathematical, scientific, and logical tasks. Inspired by human cognitive flexibility - our ability to dynamically switch mental perspec...
While post-training improves the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), it generally lowers their output diversity and creativity, negatively impacting tasks that explicitly require creativity (e.g., story generation) as well as those that require it implicitly, e.g., reinforcement learning (RL). We instead prop...
Ananya Sahu, Mohit Bansal, Elias Stengel-Eskin· 0 citations