Skip to content

Vision--Language Signals in Constrained RL: Safety Gains Without Anticipation

Sep 2026 · 1 citation · 40 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

VLM-Safe-RL is proposed, a framework that integrates frozen CLIP signals into PPO-Lagrangian through reward shaping and an augmented multiplier update, and shows a conditional reduction in observed catastrophe rate without evidence of collision anticipation.

Abstract

Safe reinforcement learning seeks policies that maximise task performance while satisfying safety constraints. In driving benchmarks, however, collision costs typically appear only at the time of collision, providing no advance warning of an approaching hazard. Frozen vision--language models can provide dense semantic feedback, yet it remains unclear whether their scores anticipate collisions and which component drives an observed safety improvement. Episodic cost can also favour policies that make little task progress. To address these gaps, we propose VLM-Safe-RL, a framework that integrates frozen CLIP signals into PPO-Lagrangian through reward shaping and an augmented multiplier update. On MetaDrive Hard, which combines the densest traffic with the largest map, the catastrophe rate falls from 31.6\% to 19.4\%. FormulaOne-L2 analysis finds no evidence that the CLIP signals anticipate collisions and shows that the VLM term has a negligible effect on the Lagrange multiplier. These findings show a conditional reduction in observed catastrophe rate without evidence of collision anticipation.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

It Is Not Seeing the Hazard: A Frozen Vision-Language Safety Score Measures Its Caption Bank

Frozen vision-language models increasingly provide safety signals for reinforcement learning. Their use assumes that similarity to language describing danger indicates the hazard itself. Yet policy return and collision rate cannot reveal whether a score detects hazards or responds to correlated features of the scene. V...

Samuel T. K. Tetteh, Cody H. Fleming · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

VLPSA: Vision-Language-Poisson-Safe Actions for Full-Body Safety of Learned Policies

This work presents Vision-Language-Poisson-Safe Actions (VLPSA), a safety filtering framework that provides full-body safety for VLA policies in cluttered and dynamic environments without retraining, and deploys VLPSA on a Franka FR3 in cluttered scenes with dynamic obstacles and human interference.

Meg Wilkinson, E. Fourney, Joel W. Burdick et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Find Something You Can't Do: Agentic Real-World Reinforcement Learning for Self-Improving VLA Models

FIND is introduced, an agentic real-world RL framework that closes the loop between scene understanding, weakness-aware practice, self-evaluation, and policy improvement in a persistent workspace and reframes autonomous practice as a scene-conditioned, performance-aware task-selection problem.

Yuan Fang, Ze-Chu Li, Hao-Lei Tong et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

RefineDrive: Reliable Failure-Guided Learning for Vision-Language-Action Driving

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models for autonomous driving rely heavily on successful expert demonstrations, leaving model-specific failures underexploited. Learning from these failures is hindered by unreliable diagnoses, poorly matched correction targets, and coarse rewards. We propose RefineDrive, a failure-guided p...

Zhe Sun, Zi-Yin Luo, Ye-Hao Lu et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Preprint Sep 2026

MINERVA: How Small Can a Manipulation Policy Be and Still Solve LIBERO?

Vision-language-action (VLA) models with billions of parameters now dominate the LIBERO manipulation benchmark, but the model capacity actually required by the benchmark remains unclear. We introduce MINERVA (MINimal Efficient Robotic Vision-Action policy), a family of deliberately compact visuomotor policies designed...

Kohei Sendai, T. Matsushima, Yusuke Iwasawa · 3 citations · ⚡1

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.