Skip to content
Preprint

Automatic differentiation in finite element stress updating

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 18 references
Mathematics Computer Science

TL;DR

The use of AD is introduced in nonlinear finite element analysis, focusing on stress updating, a key and repeatedly executed step in which stresses are computed from strain increments, demonstrating that automatic differentiation can streamline the development of nonlinear material models.

Abstract

Computational solid mechanics relies on the discretisation of differential equations, requiring numerical differentiation and integration, often via quadrature. Recently, automatic differentiation (AD) has attracted interest as a tool to support these operations. This paper introduces the use of AD in nonlinear finite element analysis, focusing on stress updating, a key and repeatedly executed step in which stresses are computed from strain increments. Both implicit and explicit schemes require derivatives of constitutive models, which can be complex, error prone, and time consuming to derive analytically. We compare traditional analytical differentiation with automatic differentiation for implementing a hyperplastic Critical State model widely used in geotechnical engineering. Drained triaxial compression tests with varying overconsolidation ratios are simulated using both approaches. The results show that AD significantly simplifies the implementation of backward Euler stress integration by removing the need for manual derivation of derivatives. Despite this simplification, AD maintains high accuracy and robustness comparable to analytical approaches. The findings demonstrate that automatic differentiation can streamline the development of nonlinear material models, enabling efficient and reliable implementation of constitutive laws of arbitrary complexity. This opens the way for more flexible and maintainable computational mechanics codes.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

An interpolating element free Galerkin scaled boundary method for elastostatic sensitivity analysis

To enable efficient and accurate first-order derivative computations of structural responses with respect to design parameters, this paper proposes a semi-analytical approach termed the interpolating element-free Galerkin scaled boundary method (IEFG-SBM) for elastostatic sensitivity analysis. Discretizing only the bou...

Shen-Shen Chen, Hao-Yu Zhang, Qing-Hua Li et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

New Efficient Implicit-Explicit Deferred Correction methods

In this work, we investigate implicit-explicit (IMEX) arbitrary high-order Deferred Correction (DeC) methods for the approximation of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Such schemes are characterized by an iterative procedure that increases the order of accuracy by one at each iteration. More precisely, we study a...

Lorenzo Micalizzi, Davide Torlo · 0 citations
Case report Sep 2026

Implicit Lagrangian Hydrodynamics with High-Order Finite Elements

A smooth artificial viscosity treatment based on smooth approximations of non-differentiable pointwise operations is introduced based on smooth approximations of non-differentiable pointwise operations to ensure robust and differentiable nonlinear solves in the presence of shocks.

Julian Andrej, Jean-Sylvain Camier, V. Dobrev et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Development of the Galerkin Finite Element Method for Stress-Based Elasticity Problems

This paper proposes a finite element approach to the numerical solution of boundary value problems of linear elasticity theory formulated directly in terms of the stress tensor components. In contrast to the classical finite element formulation, in which displacements are the primary unknowns, the approach considered h...

A. Khaldjigitov, A. Bobonazarov, U. Djumayozov et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

A Systematic Analysis of Automatic Differentiation versus Discretization-based Constraints for Physics-Informed PDE Solvers

As nonlinearity strengthens, the accuracy advantage of discretization-based constraints becomes increasingly pronounced, with smaller optimization errors compensating for the truncation errors, and the more complex the nonlinearity and boundary conditions, the greater the advantage of GNN over MLP.

Xing Guo, Hong-Wei Tang, Ze-Wei Meng et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

INVESTIGATE A RANGE OF NUMERICAL IMPLICIT METHODS FOR SOLVING STIFF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

The phenomena of stiffness and general-purpose methods for solving stiff differential equations are the primary topics of this investigation. We are attempting to characterize the distinct features of stiff differential equations as well as the precise location of the problem. A numerical technique is required since an...

Nazneen Parveen, Najmuddin Ahmad · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.