Aug 2026· Emerging Science Journal· Vol 10, pp. 2240-2263· 0 citations· 53 references
TL;DR
A less resource-demanding yet more robust decision-making process is obtained, which is not only suitable for supply chain management but can also be extended to sectors such as risk assessment and strategic planning, ultimately supporting better decision-making under uncertainty.
Abstract
The central objective of this research is to improve the quality of decision-making in supply chain management by effectively addressing the uncertainties present in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) problems through the innovative use of Dual Neutrosophic Fuzzy Sets (DNFS). To achieve this, four distinct new aggregation operators are introduced: Dual Neutrosophic Fuzzy Hamy Mean (DNFHM), Dual Neutrosophic Fuzzy Weighted Hamy Mean (DNFWHM), Dual Neutrosophic Fuzzy Hamy Dual Mean (DNFHDM), and Dual Neutrosophic Fuzzy Weighted Hamy Dual Mean (DNFWHDM). These operators are formally defined using various computational methods and scoring functions. In addition, the authors present an algorithm that enables the ranking of alternatives based on their aggregated values. The methods introduced in the article are tested on a supplier selection problem. The results of this study reveal that the use of the DNFWHDM operator is not only the most reliable in terms of ranking stability and consistency, but also capable of outperforming conventional approaches by successfully reflecting the interdependencies among attributes while simultaneously handling uncertainties in the data. The significance of this research becomes clearer when considering that existing MADM methods often struggle to manage relationships among the objects they address or rarely impose membership constraints sufficiently, alongside methodological inadequacies. This is where the present paper employs the dual neutrosophic set framework combined with Hamy mean operators to go beyond the limitations of existing MADM solutions. As a result, a less resource-demanding yet more robust decision-making process is obtained, which is not only suitable for supply chain management but can also be extended to sectors such as risk assessment and strategic planning, ultimately supporting better decision-making under uncertainty.
Selecting an optimal warehouse location is a complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issue involving both quantitative and qualitative factors. This study develops a FuzzyTOPSIS-based evaluation framework to identify the most suitable warehouse location for YG Express Joint Stock Company. Four potential sites-Tha...
Q. Bùi, Vinh Xuan Hoang, Do Thi Thanh Truc et al.· VNU University of Economics...· 0 citations
Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making is important for technology assessment when expert judgments contain uncertainty, hesitation, and inconsistent evidence. This study develops a T-Spherical Fuzzy-Valued Neutrosophic Set (T-SFVNS)-based MEREC-EDAS framework for evaluating low-carbon cooling and energy-management techn...
National logistics benchmarks such as the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) still focus mainly on operational performance and say little about the digital capacity of logistics systems. To address this gap, this paper combines two complementary sources: the Agility Emerging Markets Logistics Index (AEMLI) and the IMD W...
Tung Bui Thanh· Scientific Annals of Economi...· 0 citations
Multi-criteria decision making approaches are extensively applied to solve complex decision problems with multiple, conflicting criteria, and uncertainty. However, current objective weighting methods, such as MEREC, are primarily developed for crisp decision-making environments and are not suitable for considering inde...
N. F. Ismail, Z. Rodzi, Z. Tarmudi et al.· 2026 7th International Confe...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.