Sep 2026· BIMTECH Business Perspectives· 0 citations
TL;DR
The framework offers managers actionable guidance for deploying agentic AI responsibly and offers regulators a structured basis for balancing innovation with oversight, while extending agency theory and sociotechnical systems theory through a reconceptualisation of agentic AI as a sociotechnical principal-cum-agent.
Abstract
This study proposes the Responsible Autonomy Framework (RAF), a layered governance architecture for agentic artificial intelligence (AI) in e-business. The RAF integrates operational efficiency, strategic adaptability, and responsible oversight into a single layered model. Using a conceptual research design grounded in an integrative literature review, agency theory, and sociotechnical systems thinking, the study develops a three-layer model comprising operational autonomy, strategic autonomy, and responsible autonomy. In which responsibility acts as the governing layer rather than an afterthought. The review finds that existing governance frameworks address transparency, accountability, or fairness largely in isolation, with none spanning the full path from operational automation to embedded governance, while the RAF addresses this by treating responsible design as a condition for sustainable autonomy rather than a competing value to be balanced against it. The framework offers managers actionable guidance for deploying agentic AI responsibly and offers regulators a structured basis for balancing innovation with oversight, while extending agency theory and sociotechnical systems theory through a reconceptualisation of agentic AI as a sociotechnical principal-cum-agent.
This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.
Faruk Çelikkanat· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
It is argued that desired-state management architectures provide a natural implementation substrate for the AAB model and have direct relevance for cloud infrastructure architects, platform engineering organizations, and policymakers engaged with AI governance in high-stakes operational contexts.
Shaileshbhai Revabhai Gothi· International journal of com...· 0 citations
The Agent Governance Framework (AGF), which integrates SC-based governance into agentic AI systems, enabling verifiable accountability through traceable autonomous decisions, is proposed and the results demonstrate 100% traceability across the E2E governance loop and a minimal latency overhead of 2–4% due to the Tracea...
J. Uriol, Emma O'Brien, Iker Hernández et al.· Applied Informatics· 0 citations
It is argued that a layered subsidiarity approach, with specific financing for capacity-building and technical standards that work across the board, is more likely to deliver effective global AI governance than calls for a binding treaty.
Asher Odhiambo Ojuok, Julius Murumba, E. Micheni· East African Journal of Info...· 0 citations
The rapid maturation of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems, capable of autonomously planning, executing, and adjusting multi-step actions with minimal human intervention, is reshaping how organizations arrive at strategic and operational decisions. Executive surveys indicate that a majority of business leader...
P. Amutha, M. Bhuvaneswari· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
Organizations deploying agentic artificial intelligence must determine more than whether a model is trustworthy; they must establish what to validate, control, and observe for a use case to deliver its intended outcome while meeting applicable obligations. This paper proposes AI-GRACE (Agentic Intelligence-Governance,...
John Cuneo, David Chun, Gaurav Khanna· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.