Skip to content

Development and validation of a novel rivaroxaban calibrator: A routine anti-Xa assay solution with high agreement with LC-MS/MS.

Sep 2026 · Thrombosis Research · Vol 266, pp. 109836 · 0 citations · 38 references
Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Therapeutic drug monitoring of rivaroxaban is essential for select patients, but anti-Xa assays can show discrepancies with the Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) reference method due to calibrator differences. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel rivaroxaban calibrator to achieve high interchangeability between the CX-9010 anti-Xa assay and LC-MS/MS.

Methods

Samples were measured concurrently by the CX-9010 anti-Xa assay and LC-MS/MS. Agreement was assessed by Pearson correlation, Passing-Bablok (PB) regression, and Bland-Altman (BA) analysis stratified by concentration: absolute differences for samples ≤50 ng/mL (n = 108) and relative differences for samples >50 ng/mL (n = 92).

Results

Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.998. PB regression yielded a slope of 0.988 (95% CI: 0.978-0.998). For samples ≤50 ng/mL, absolute BA showed a mean bias of -0.73 ng/mL and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of -8.74 to +7.28 ng/mL. For samples >50 ng/mL, relative BA showed a mean bias of -0.44% and LoA of -10.1% to +9.3%. Intra-vial CVs ranged from 0.85% to 2.52%, and inter-vial CVs from 0.95% to 2.21% across all six calibrator levels. Working calibrator stability over 34 h showed a maximum deviation of +4.91% relative to baseline, with all time-point deviations remaining within ±5%.

Conclusions

The CX-9010 assay demonstrated strong agreement with LC-MS/MS in this single-center cohort. The calibrator quality met all predefined targets, supporting its use for routine clinical monitoring; multicenter validation is warranted before broader claims of interchangeability can be made.

View source

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.