Skip to content
Open access

Standardising Access to Sensitive Data with Machine-Actionable Access Conditions

Sep 2026 · International Journal of Population Data Science · Vol 11 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

A framework for standardising access governance using machine-actionable access conditions that addresses key challenges identified in the Dutch context — including fragmentation, administrative burden, and inconsistent decision-making — and is applicable across European data infrastructures is presented.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction While many countries have invested heavily in secure technical infrastructures such as Trusted Research Environments (TREs), the rules that determine who may access which data, under what conditions, and for which purposes are still expressed primarily as natural language legal and administrative documents, with little or no accompanying machine-readable representation. This limits automation, interoperability, and scalability, particularly for research that spans multiple data holders. Objectives This paper examines these challenges through the Dutch social science data landscape and presents a framework for standardising access governance using machine-actionable access conditions, with the aim of bridging the gap between secure technical environments and scalable access governance. Methods Building on the Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL), we propose a library of reusable access condition templates and a Data Access Broker service. The framework was developed through iterative consultation with data holders in the Dutch SSH domain and draws on ongoing developments within the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) and related data sharing initiatives. Results We demonstrate that machine-actionable access conditions can operationalise legal and organisational oversight in a transparent, auditable, and interoperable way without replacing it. The proposed framework addresses key challenges identified in the Dutch context — including fragmentation, administrative burden, and inconsistent decision-making — and is applicable across European data infrastructures. Conclusions The approach does not replace legal or organisational oversight, but operationalises it in a transparent, auditable, and interoperable way. While grounded in the Dutch context and the ODISSEI infrastructure, the challenges addressed are common across Europe. The paper presents a concrete implementation pathway supporting ongoing developments within EOSC and related data sharing initiatives.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Two-Point Authorization Engine with Revocable Sharing for Multitenant Environments

The access-kit is presented, an in-process authorization engine for the .NET platform built on an explicit model: principals, “area:verb” actions, composable deny-wins policy statements with inheritance, and a resource hierarchy, and an analytic cost model and an evaluation measured on PostgreSQL.

A. Melnychenko, O. V. Shaldenko · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

FAIR by design (TRACE): A Trusted Research Access & Collaboration Environment

TRACE was designed to support several data-sharing elements highlighted in the 2025 SPIRIT and CONSORT statements by providing controlled and auditable workflows and supporting reproducibility at the level of data and analysis code.

Marcel Müller, Benjamin P. Geisler, S. Shamas et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Legal Framework and Practical Examples of the EU Data Act in Nondestructive Testing

The data-driven networking and interoperability of Industry 4.0 makes non-destructive testing (NDT) a key provider of safety-critical quality data. The EU Data Act creates a legal framework for fair access to and use of data generated when using networked products and related services. This article provides an overview...

Johannes Ludwig Vrana, F. Leinenbach, R. Casperson et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Illusion of Private AI: Rethinking Data Privacy in Isolated Contextand Private Knowledge Base Systems

Private AI is used in this paper as a deployment-based umbrella term for AI systems whose data and computation are constrained within a defined trust boundary. That boundary may be local or on-device, on-premises or private-network infrastructure, a private or dedicated cloud, or a managed cloud service that provides l...

Karim Mualla · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Verifiable Computation with Trusted Execution Environments and On-Chain Digital Rights Tokens

We present an architecture that enables data owners to combine private data into data pools using Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) and manage these pools by issuing narrowly scoped computational rights, encoded as Digital Rights Tokens (DRTs), to third-party data analysts. Each DRT binds specific open-source code...

B. Kruger, Co-Pierre Georg · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Institutional data commons: a federated Data Use Certification-aware architecture for secure and scalable data use in biomedical data ecosystems.

This work proposes reframing institutional data commons as governance-aware intermediaries to ensure secure, efficient and sustainable use of controlled-access biomedical data, and proposes a federated architecture that decouples storage from authorization.

Saonli Basu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.