Aug 2026· Journal of the Acoustical Society of America· Vol 159, pp. A156-A156· 0 citations
TL;DR
Evaluation against manually annotated phonetic boundaries examines segmentation errors across phonetic boundary types, identifying conditions under which self-supervised embeddings exhibit different behavior while maintaining the simplicity of the original bottom-up approach.
Abstract
Unsupervised phonetic segmentation provides a bottom-up alternative to forced alignment, enabling phonetic analyses without predefined segment labels and supporting a range of speech research scenarios where detailed phonetic annotation is unavailable or unnecessary. In previous work, I introduced a lightweight Praat-based implementation that segments speech into phone-sized units by computing framewise differences on traditional acoustic representations such as mel spectrograms and MFCCs, achieving competitive performance on benchmark data while remaining easy to install and use. In this paper, I extend that framework by incorporating self-supervised speech embeddings derived from recent deep learning models (e.g., wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT, WavLM, and Whisper) as alternative input representations. These embeddings are learned without phonetic supervision yet are known to encode contextualized phonetic structure and invariances that may not be readily captured by low-level acoustic features. This study extends prior work by comparing self-supervised embeddings with traditional acousticrepresentations using the same windowed difference measures and peak-based boundary detection procedures. Evaluation against manually annotated phonetic boundaries examines segmentation errors across phonetic boundary types, identifying conditions under which self-supervised embeddings exhibit different behavior while maintaining the simplicity of the original bottom-up approach.
This work demonstrates TAPA on the 2016 U.S. presidential debate, and suggests that TAPA can be used to increase access to naturalistic speech data and speed up the processing timeline with experts' supervision.
Ethan Kutlu, Emerson Peters, Ciara Tapanes et al.· Behavior Research Methods· 0 citations
This paper introduces a syllable-level UASR framework based on masked language modeling, which avoids the need for G2P and the instability of GAN-based methods and generalizes effectively to low-resource languages that have remained particularly difficult for prior methods.
Liming Wang, Kai-Wei Chang, K. Kashino et al.· 0 citations
This work presents TontaubeV1, a model that preserves natural prosody while enabling streaming from a single consumer GPU, and is designed primarily for English and German, with additional multilingual support.
This paper addresses unsupervised speech enhancement in the unpaired setting using drifting methods, where training relies on separate collections of degraded and clean audio without corresponding pairs. While recent drifting approaches enable unpaired training, they do so at a heavy cost: because the objective optimiz...
Diego Caviedes-Nozal, Liang Xu, R. Olsson et al.· 0 citations
FuseAlign, a transformer-based aligner trained on large-scale pseudo-labeled speech with online label correction, is introduced, a transformer-based aligner trained on large-scale pseudo-labeled speech with online label correction that substantially outperforms all baselines and remains robust under real ASR transcript...
Mithilesh Vaidya, Stephen W. Bailey, Sumukh Badam et al.· 0 citations
Regional accent cues can be captured under matched conditions, but it remains unclear whether they persist between read and spontaneous speech. We study RVG1, with 500 German speakers from nine regions, comparing ten speech representations on regional classification and continuous geolocation under matched conditions a...
P. A. Pérez-Toro, Tomás Arias-Vergara, Annette Schwarz et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.