Skip to content
Open access

Single-Stranded Interruptions in the T7 Promoter Non-Template Strand Exhibit Unexpected Transcription Behavior.

Sep 2026 · Angewandte Chemie · pp. e2229119 · 0 citations · 22 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Structurally, small gaps may disrupt essential hydrogen bonding while larger gaps may increase promoter interaction with T7RNAP, thereby improving binding and initiation while hindering promoter release, and suggest novel strategies for DNA-based transcriptional control in bio-hybrid systems.

Abstract

T7 RNA polymerase (T7RNAP) is widely used for in vitro transcription due to its high specificity and efficiency. Its ability to initiate transcription from a promoter containing single-stranded interruptions, however, remains largely unexplored even though such an ability might provide a potential mechanism for transcriptional regulation in vitro. Here, we systematically introduce single-stranded gaps of varying sizes and positions within the non-template strand of the T7 promoter to investigate their effects on transcription, hypothesizing that small gaps would essentially be tolerated while large gaps would be inhibitory. Surprisingly, single-nucleotide gaps in the promoter's specificity region (-11 to -8) prevented transcription and larger gaps allowed transcription. Fluorescence and gel-based assays confirmed these effects. Structurally, small gaps may disrupt essential hydrogen bonding while larger gaps may increase promoter interaction with T7RNAP, thereby improving binding and initiation while hindering promoter release. These insights reveal new aspects of T7RNAP function and suggest novel strategies for DNA-based transcriptional control in bio-hybrid systems, which we demonstrate by introducing an RNA-dependent transcription-based molecular switch.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Size and sequence variation of the Lid of the Cas12a nuclease domain results in a nickase phenotype

Abstract CRISPR–Cas12a nucleases typically induce double-strand breaks (DSBs) to initiate genome editing. However, reliance on DSBs risks chromosomal rearrangements and unintended insertions or deletions at off-target sites. Therefore, engineering nickase variants that cleave only a single DNA strand might enable preci...

Ricardo Villegas Warren, Satoshi N. Omura, Diana León-Castro et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

High-resolution binding data of TFIID and cofactors show promoter-specific differences

TFIID is instrumental in recognizing promoter sequences and initiating transcription, yet a cohesive understanding of how this complex engages and functions at different promoter types in vivo is still lacking. Here, we employed ChIP-nexus to capture high-resolution binding footprints of all Drosophila TFIID subu...

Sergio G.-M. Alcantara, Simon Bourdareau, Melanie Weilert et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Rewriting the genome: harnessing R2 retrotransposons for precise DNA insertion

CRISPR-based genome editors are fundamentally limited by their requirement for double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), restricted transgene cargo capacity, and reliance on error-prone endogenous DNA repair mechanisms. Non–long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons—especially the site-specific R2 element—offer a mechanist...

Liang-Zheng Fu, Ya-Chao Wu, Xiao-Hua Jin et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Dual-mode application of transcriptional regulation and DNA editing using the ultra-compact TnpB system

A dual-mode genome regulation platform using ISDge10 TnpB effectors and engineered ωRNAs is established, in which modulation of the ωRNA guide length enables switching between programmable transcriptional activation and genome editing.

Y. Oh, Se-Been Jeon, Lee Wha Gwon et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.