Skip to content

TabFM-Auto: Self-Evolving Pipelines for Tabular Foundation Models

Sep 2026 · 1 citation · 46 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

TabFM-Auto is introduced, which pairs a tabular foundation model, TabFM, with a language model agent that evolves the data pipeline around it, and ranks first overall among MLE agents.

Abstract

Tabular foundation models achieve strong zero-shot accuracy on structured data by pretraining on synthetic tables, but they ignore the column names, task descriptions, and auxiliary files that carry dataset semantics. Meanwhile, self-evolving machine learning engineering (MLE) agents train models from scratch on each dataset, yet jointly searching over features, architectures, and hyperparameters is noisy and prone to overfitting. We introduce TabFM-Auto, which pairs a tabular foundation model, TabFM, with a language model agent that evolves the data pipeline around it. Guided by dataset metadata and validation feedback, TabFM-Auto iteratively refines data cleaning, feature engineering, context selection, and post-processing to reduce TabFM's error. Across all 51 datasets of the TabArena benchmark, five TabFM-Auto configurations with different agents and language models take the top five overall positions, and the best raises TabFM from 1785 to 2013 Elo. The discovered pipelines also transfer to other frozen tabular foundation models (+69 to +143 Elo) with no further search. On the 8 tabular competitions of MLE-Bench, TabFM-Auto ranks first overall among MLE agents.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

TabFM: A Zero-Shot Foundation Model for Tabular Data

TabFM, a 400M-parameter tabular foundation model that formulates supervised tabular prediction as in-context learning, produces calibrated zero-shot predictions in a single forward pass without task-specific tuning.

Wei-Hao Kong, Erez Louidor Ilan, Shu-Xin Nie et al. · 17 citations · ⚡4
Review Open access Aug 2026

The Current Generation of Tabular Foundation Models: A Critical Review

This review is, to the authors' knowledge, the first organised around the current generation of tabular foundation models, and taxonomises the architectures by pretraining regime, maps the capability space across five axes, isolates the language-model-on-tabular strand for prediction, feature engineering and generation...

S. Kurashkin, V. Tynchenko, Alexey S. Borodulin et al. · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

RelICL: Training-free Relational Learning with Tabular Foundation Models

Tabular foundation models achieve state-of-the-art performance on single-table tasks without any training. Recent work suggests that they are also well-suited for relational learning via deep feature synthesis (DFS), which flattens a relational schema into a single table by adding aggregates of the other tables'columns...

Simon Forbat, Rainer Gemulla · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Benchmarking Attention for Tabular Foundation Models

Tabular in-context learners such as TabPFN, Mitra, or ConTextTab rely on alternating row and column attention over 2D sequences of latent embeddings. These attention patterns differ markedly from the one-dimensional case in language models: row attention involves longer sequences while column attention operates on much...

Maximilian Schambach, Clemens Biehl, Sam Thelin · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

A JEPA Recipe for Tabular Foundation Models

Tabular foundation models learn to predict cell values in context, whereas world-model self-supervision asks for prediction in representation space (LeCun, 2022; Assran et al., 2023). On a tabular foundation-model prior, the latent term of a joint-embedding predictive architecture (JEPA) collapsed in our earlier runs a...

Mingyu Jeon, Suwan Cho, Jae-Young Suh · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Do Tabular Foundation Models Still Need Feature Engineering?

A controlled study across several versions of two major TFM families finds a consistent pattern: feature engineering gains are concentrated in earlier model generations and become negligible for the strongest models, suggesting that stronger TFMs depend less on explicitly engineered input representations.

Yi-Fan Wu, Pin-Jun Dong, Jia Tao et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.