Skip to content

Completion Aware Guidance for World Action Models

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 26 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper introduces Completion Aware Guidance (CAG), a training-free sampling method that guides generation toward task completion, and shows that this failure is not inherent to the world model backbone, but emerges when adapted for short-chunk control.

Abstract

World Action Models (WAMs) predict visual futures and robot actions, yet they remain susceptible to task-incomplete imagination, where plausible, action-consistent predictions omit the transition needed for task completion. In this paper, we show that this failure is not inherent to the world model backbone, but emerges when adapted for short-chunk control, which can repeatedly favor plausible local continuations over task-completing transitions. To address this, we introduce Completion Aware Guidance (CAG), a training-free sampling method that guides generation toward task completion. Across representative WAMs, CAG improves success from 64% to 70% on a RoboTwin 2.0 subset and from 69% to 75% in zero-shot simulation, while reducing task-incomplete imagination from 79% to 40%.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Achieve What You Imagined: Learning to Align Actions with Visual Plans

This work uses a frozen action-conditioned world model to predict action-conditioned consequences and construct feedback based on consistency between the two future predictions and alignment with the terminal goal to show that cross-model prediction discrepancy can provide useful feedback for improving robot policies u...

Yu-Heng Qiao, Zi-Ran Wei, Xiao-Hang Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Latent Action as Intention Enables Efficient Future Imagination for World Action Models

World action models (WAMs) improve robot control by modeling how observations evolve, but generating future observations at test time incurs substantial latency. Fast-WAM removes this process for efficiency; however, our matched implementations show lower generalization for Fast-WAM than for future-aware alternatives,...

Xiang Li, Yu-Peng Zheng, Song-En Gu et al. · 6 citations · ⚡2
Preprint Oct 2026

What Limits Cross-Task Generalization in World Action Models?

Cross-task generalization remains difficult for world action models (WAMs), even when their predicted futures depict plausible manipulation. This gap can be attributed directly: we make this gap directly testable by decoupling a WAM into a world model and an inverse-dynamics model (IDM), then holding the IDM fixed whil...

Chen Zhao, Zi-Peng Ye, Yi-Han Lin et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

World Action Modeling with Progressive Visual Planning

World action models (WAMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for robotic control by jointly predicting future visual dynamics and actions from an initial observation and instruction. However, existing WAMs struggle with long-horizon prediction, as generating dense video rollouts is highly inefficient. Some recent WA...

Fei Zhang, Zhao-Chong An, Duncan P. Frost et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Direct Experience World-Model Optimization: Learning the World Beyond Action Imitation

World-Action Models (WAMs) couple action generation with predictions of how physical interactions unfold. However, current post-deployment learning paradigms typically improve behavior without requiring better world predictions. Especially in dexterous manipulation, small execution errors can compound in high-dimension...

Xiang-Cheng Zhan, Zi-Rui Chen, Yi-Cheng Zhao et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

Rethinking World-Action Model for Compositional and In-Context Robotic Manipulation

Long-horizon compositional manipulation has become increasingly important for real-world robot deployment, where a single task involves multiple coordinated subtasks. Existing world-action models (WAMs) jointly predict short-horizon visual futures and actions, but typically lack explicit subtask-level reasoning. We pro...

Shu-Kai Gong, Xuan-Ran Zhai, Yintianrun Zhang et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.