Skip to content
Review Open access

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: Bridging the Gap between Opportunity and Teacher Readiness via the Extended UTAUT Framework

Jul 2026 · Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science · Vol 3, pp. 618-636 · 0 citations · 21 references

TL;DR

By isolating the crucial components of fairness, accountability, and agency which underpin the factors most predictive of teacher readiness, this study lays a framework for leaders and policy makers searching to translate teacher doubt into enthusiastic and responsible carrying out of AI tools.

Abstract

The world of education is undergoing a transformative paradigm shift, as generative artificial intelligence is being integrated into the learning environment. The rapid development in Generative AI recently have revolutionized the classroom and teaching methodologies. In that regard, this study focuses on how teachers perceive generative AI under the formulation of an Extended UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) model, the advantages and challenges related with its application. A descriptive method was adopted for this study and teachers' perceptions in regard to Performance Expectancy (pedagogical effectiveness) and Effort Expectancy (AI literacy) was explored. Data were obtained from 146 teachers through use of survey methodology. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in the analysis of the collected data. The result has a crucial difference, because the perceived pedagogical utility and the technical expertise may amend the teacher's confidence for using the system. However, lack of indispensable facilitating conditions (deficient training, unclear governance etc) and ethical concerns may hinder implementation. These findings emphasize the urgent demand for professional development and clear institutional policy, announced by the UNESCO (2023) and Floridi et al. (2018) normative anchors. By isolating the crucial components of fairness, accountability, and agency which underpin the factors most predictive of teacher readiness, this study lays a framework for leaders and policy makers searching to translate teacher doubt into enthusiastic and responsible carrying out of AI tools. Clearly defining governing rules, strengthening facilitating conditions, will help address the fears that shortly impede the adoption of generative AI in schools.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

The illusion of teaching competence in AI-mediated education

The concept of the “illusion of teaching competence” is introduced as a distinct theoretical construct, referring to the overestimation of pedagogical expertise derived from technological fluency and instrumental performance, and differentiating it from related constructs such as self-efficacy and competence overestimation.

Mona Bădoi-Hammami, S. Matei, Sorin Ivan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Generative AI as a Learning Partner or Pedagogical Challenge? Insights from Pre-service Teachers

This study investigates how pre-service teachers experience generative artificial intelligence tools in their learning processes and how they plan to integrate these technologies into their future teaching practices. The study employed a qualitative phenomenological design and was conducted with 28 pre-service teachers enrolled in the English language teaching program of a public university in Türkiye. Semi-structured online interviews were carried out, and the data were analyzed through content analysis. Coding was conducted independently by two coders, achieving a high level of inter-rater agreement. The findings reveal that pre-service teachers perceive generative artificial intelligence as a supportive learning partner in areas such as time management, idea development, linguistic accuracy, and self-regulation. However, they also highlighted risks such as over-reliance, diminished creativity, ethical concerns, and the generation of inaccurate information. The participants emphasized that while generative artificial intelligence may serve as a complementary tool in learning processes, classroom integration requires transparency, critical verification, and active teacher guidance as essential conditions. The originality of the study lies in its holistic exploration of pre-service teachers’ experiences with generative artificial intelligence across pedagogical, ethical, and professional identity dimensions. These findings provide qualitative evidence for the relatively underexplored perspectives of pre-service teachers, thereby offering a new lens for ongoing debates on the role of generative artificial intelligence in teacher education.

Mehmet Kokoç · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY IN TEACHER EDUCATION: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR BASIC EDUCATION

The rapid expansion of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has been reshaping teaching, learning, and knowledge production practices, creating new challenges for teacher education in Basic Education. In this context, Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy has emerged as an essential competency for educators to use these technologies in a critical, ethical, and pedagogically meaningful manner. This study aims to analyze the contributions of the specialized literature to the understanding of AI literacy as a foundational dimension of teacher education in Basic Education. This is a qualitative study developed through an analytical-interpretative literature review based on national and international publications recognized as key references in the contemporary debate on Artificial Intelligence, education, teacher education, media literacy, critical thinking, and digital ethics. The analysis of the selected studies revealed a broad consensus regarding the potential of AI to support personalized learning, instructional planning, the development of educational resources, and pedagogical innovation, provided that its use is guided by pedagogical intentionality and effective teacher mediation. Conversely, the literature highlights challenges related to intellectual authorship, algorithmic bias, information reliability, personal data protection, academic integrity, and the lack of public policies aimed at continuing teacher professional development. As its main theoretical contribution, this study proposes understanding AI literacy as a multidimensional construct organized into five interdependent dimensions: conceptual, pedagogical, ethical, critical, and professional development. It concludes that consolidating AI literacy is a strategic prerequisite for enabling teachers to act autonomously, responsibly, and reflectively in educational contexts increasingly mediated by intelligent systems, thereby strengthening pedagogical practices committed to human development, digital citizenship, and educational innovation.

Swanson Abreu Saraiva Santos, Cecília Lima Corrêa de Oliveira, Alcino Franco de Moura Júnior · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Revolutionizing Education: Analyzing the Transformative Potential of Generative AI in Learning Environment

ChatGPT has rapidly gained popularity among educators and learners, demonstrating its potential to facilitate interactive learning, personalized assistance, and academic support, and the need for guidelines, digital literacy, and ethical frameworks to ensure productive and balanced use of AI in education.

Anuradha Dwivedi, Pragati Pandey, Naveen Mni · 0 citations
Review Open access May 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Shadow Teacher: Implications for Teachers' Pedagogical Authority in Education

The development of generative artificial intelligence in education has brought about significant transformations in learning practices, particularly through its emergence as a shadow teacher capable of providing explanations, feedback, and learning materials instantly. This situation has given rise to new problems related to the shift in teachers' pedagogical authority, both in epistemic, relational, and normative aspects in formal classrooms. This study aims to analyze the impact of the use of generative AI on teachers' pedagogical authority and identify the opportunities and challenges it poses in the contemporary educational context. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature review method, which includes data collection through searching reputable journal articles, academic books, research reports, and education policy documents relevant to the topic of AI and pedagogy. Data analysis techniques used thematic and comparative analysis to identify patterns, trends, and differences in expert views. Data validity was maintained through evaluation of source credibility, reference recency, and argument consistency, while triangulation was carried out by comparing findings from various types of sources and disciplinary perspectives. The results of the study indicate that generative AI has the potential to shift teachers' pedagogical authority from the center of knowledge transmission to the role of facilitator, learning curator, and value builder, but not completely replace the role of the teacher. Pedagogical authority is actually undergoing a redefinition, demanding stronger pedagogical, ethical, and digital literacy competencies. This research implies the importance of developing teacher education and training policies that are adaptive to the integration of AI in a critical, humanistic manner, and oriented toward strengthening teachers' strategic role in the digital learning ecosystem.

Izza Agitsna, Arief Ardyansyah, Ega Krisna Pradita et al. · 0 citations