Skip to content
Preprint

Which Languages Transfer Best to Warlpiri? A Similarity-Based Study for Low-Resource ASR

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 40 references
Computer Science Engineering

TL;DR

Correlation analysis indicates that acoustic similarity is the strongest predictor of fine-tuning performance, while phoneme inventory and typological similarity better explain zero-shot transfer.

Abstract

This paper investigates how language similarity can improve cross-lingual transfer for automatic speech recognition (ASR) in extremely low-resource settings. Warlpiri, an Australian Aboriginal language, has very limited transcribed speech data, making transfer learning essential. We propose a framework combining acoustic similarity from pre-trained speech models with linguistic similarity based on typology, phoneme inventories, grammatical, and syntactic features to rank high-resource source languages and evaluate their effectiveness for ASR transfer to Warlpiri. Experiments with Whisper show that acoustically and typologically similar languages outperform monolingual and multilingual baselines. Assamese and Hindi achieve substantial reductions in word and character error rates. Correlation analysis further indicates that acoustic similarity is the strongest predictor of fine-tuning performance, while phoneme inventory and typological similarity better explain zero-shot transfer.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Jul 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Linguistic Relatedness on Cross-Lingual Transfer in Large Multilingual Automatic Speech Recognition

In every setting, pre-adaptation on related auxiliary languages yields no practically meaningful improvements once as little as one hour of target-language data is available, suggesting that relatedness alone may not reliably predict transfer gains in large multilingual ASR, or constitute an effective strategy for extending such models to low-resource languages.

A. Florian, C. Amol, Hope Kerubo Ombaba et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Speech-to-text model comparison using XLS-R, XLSR-53, and Wav2Vec 2.0

Findings indicate that language-specific fine-tuning plays a more critical role than multilingual generalization in achieving accurate ASR for Indonesian and provide practical guidance for deploying ASR systems in low-resource language scenarios.

Juan Hebert, Amalia Zahra · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

SraVaani 1.0: Scaling Inclusive Speech Recognition for Indic Languages

India's linguistic landscape spans over 700 languages and thousands of dialects, yet the vast majority of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems support only a small fraction of this diversity. We present SraVaani-1.0, a multilingual ASR model covering 65 Indian languages and dialects, many of which currently have no publicly available or competing ASR system. SraVaani-1.0 is built on a FastConformer architecture and trained from scratch through a three stage the first stage, we perform self-supervised pretraining on 31,255 hours of unlabelled speech from the VAANI corpus using a contrastive learning objective. In the second stage, we introduce an audio-image representation alignment stage that leverages the paired images and speech available in the VAANI corpus. This multimodal alignment encourages the speech encoder to learn semantically richer representations by exploiting the relationship between visual context and spoken content, thereby improving downstream recognition, particularly for low resource the final stage, the aligned encoder is fine-tuned end-to-end using a Hybrid Token-and-Duration Transducer (TDT)-CTC decoder on 31,263 hours of labelled multilingual Indian speech compiled from 24 public datasets spanning 65 languages and dialects. We evaluate SraVaani-1.0 against three state-of-the-art multilingual ASR systems across eight benchmarks. SraVaani-1.0 achieves the lowest word error rate (WER) on a large number of language-dataset pairs while remaining competitive with the best-performing systems on high resource importantly, it is the only open-source evaluated model that provides transcription capability for multiple low-resource and tribal Indian languages, which are assessed exclusively on the VAANI benchmark.

Sujith Pulikodan, A. Basu, J. Pavankumar et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1
Preprint Aug 2026

Generative vs. Encoder Large Language Models for ASR Evaluation: A Comparative Study

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is typically evaluated using Word Error Rate (WER), which poorly reflects semantic similarity. While embedding-based metrics correlate better with human judgments, the respective roles of encoder and decoder-based Large Language Models (LLMs) remain underexplored. This paper presents a comparative study of both families for ASR evaluation. We analyze BERTScore and SemDist across different LLMs, layers, and pooling strategies, showing that both metrics can achieve strong correlation with human judgments when properly configured. For decoder models, we investigate generative LLMs in two settings: pairwise hypothesis selection via prompting and direct qualitative error classification. Our results show that encoder-based metrics remain highly competitive, while generative LLMs perform strongly in hypothesis comparison and improve the interpretability of ASR evaluation.

Thibault Bañeras-Roux, Shashi Kumar, Driss Khalil et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

DonorRank: Donor Language Selection for Low-Resource Cross-Lingual Speech Recognition

Low-resource automatic speech recognition (ASR) commonly relies on cross-lingual transfer, where models are adapted from higher-resource donor languages. However, selecting donors remains challenging for spontaneous speech from under-resourced language communities, due to linguistic variation, evolving orthographic conventions, and uneven resource availability. We present DonorRank, a learning-to-rank framework for predicting effective donor languages for zero-shot ASR. We evaluate DonorRank on two multilingual speech corpora of Indic and African language families. It accurately predicts donor language rankings and improves donor selection over common heuristics based on genetic similarity or high-resource languages. Beyond improving transfer, we show how DonorRank is a general framework for analyzing donor language selection itself. Our analyses show that the composition of the donor set determines which linguistic cues are useful in predicting successful transfer. We also identify transfer patterns that provide practical guidance for multilingual ASR in low-resource settings.

Akriti Dhasmana, Aarohi Srivastava, David Chiang · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Forced alignment of Istro-Venetian speech via neural versus non-neural models

Forced aligners are an essential tool to facilitate access to the word and phone level of speech data, but they rely on acoustic models, pronunciation dictionaries, and complete word-level transcriptions that may not exist for low-resource languages. Alternatively, word-level alignments can be extracted from neural network-based tools for automatic speech recognition like Wav2Vec-BERT 2.0, avoiding the need to create bespoke acoustic models and dictionaries. This paper compares the ability of the Montreal Forced Aligner (MFA) and Wav2Vec-BERT 2.0 to produce word-level alignments for the low-resource variety Istro-Venetian, spoken in Croatia. Results indicate that MFA, which uses Gaussian mixture models with hidden Markov models, significantly outperforms Wav2Vec-BERT 2.0 on forced alignment. However, we show that Wav2Vec-BERT 2.0 can produce transcriptions with a word error rate of only 14.4%. Neural models can thus aid research on low-resource languages by creating transcriptions that can be used as input to forced aligners, and with sufficient data they may also perform acceptably on forced alignment.

Austin Jones, Massimo Daul, Margaret E. L. Renwick et al. · 0 citations