Comparisons show that OCR specialization largely preserves head identity, retaining 17-20 of the top 20 heads per task with all-head rank correlations of 0.874-0.942, while redistributing their functional and causal strengths.
Abstract
Does a general vision--language model acquire specialized OCR ability by developing a new reading circuit or by reusing an existing mechanism? We address this question in the setting of full-sequence OCR, rather than local-answer retrieval. Using an evidence-grounded protocol with held-out causal interventions, we identify sparse and stable OCR-head sets in GLM-OCR, MinerU2.5, and PaddleOCR-VL-1.6. We then investigate the mechanistic origin of these OCR heads by comparing them with independently identified textual retrieval/copy heads in general VLMs. Across two general VLMs, visual OCR heads strongly overlap independently identified textual retrieval/copy heads, yielding untuned top-20 intersections of 73.3% and all-head Spearman correlations of 0.677-0.886. The overlap and causal interventions suggest that full-sequence OCR operates as dense sequential multimodal copy-and-paste, repeatedly retrieving visual evidence and routing it to the current output position. Finally, we examine how this shared circuit changes as a general VLM becomes an OCR specialist. Matched base-to-specialized comparisons show that OCR specialization largely preserves head identity, retaining 17-20 of the top 20 heads per task with all-head rank correlations of 0.874-0.942, while redistributing their functional and causal strengths.
This work introduces Visual Retrieval Heads (VRHs), a small subset of attention heads that are causally responsible for grounding text descriptions to image regions, and shows that scoring attention from output prediction tokens with a sum over the ground-truth referent region most reliably identifies causal heads.
Chanho Park, Daehyeon Choi, Jihyun Lee et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1
Across four models, attention heads causally necessary for OCR are identified, and it is discovered that these are in fact general-purpose heads that output interpretable semantic features across all image tokens.
Sheridan Feucht, Benno Krojer, Sarah Wang et al.· 0 citations
Retrieval-augmented document question answering assumes that once the right page is found, a vision-language model (VLM) can read it. We show that this assumption often fails, leaving a retrieval-reading gap: evidence found but not used. A paired protocol isolates this gap by comparing answers from the retrieved page i...
Qing-Tao Xia, Si-Yao Cheng, Jia-Hua Bao et al.· 0 citations
A spatial novelty constraint is introduced that promotes coverage of distinct image regions and prevents the retained tokens from concentrating in a few locally salient areas and prevents the retained tokens from concentrating in a few locally salient areas in E2S-Pruner.
Many vision applications ask several independent, forced-choice questions about the same image. Visual Jev encodes the image and public context once, executes isolated question suffixes as a batch, and reads candidate probabilities from the backbone's language-model head. Across four benchmarks, answer-supervised post-...
Compact OCR-specific vision-language models achieve strong document parsing performance, but often rely on costly supervision and focus primarily on visual-text reconstruction. We introduce Xiaomi-OCR-0, a unified 0.8B model for document parsing and OCR-centric understanding. We build an approximately 170M-sample OCR-c...
Xin Chen, An-An Du, Feng-Juan Feng et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.