This work learns a conditional generative model for single-neuron electrophysiology, using flow matching with a velocity field conditioned on the input current, and shows that this model recovers both modes in each case, while a neural operator baseline suppresses spiking near threshold and blurs the gap between modes at depolarization block.
Abstract
Neurons of the brain exhibit a rich repertoire of electrophysiology dynamics with the same repeated stimulus eliciting very different voltage responses from the same cell. One common approach in biophysically detailed models is to capture this variability through ensembles of deterministic parametrizations, at a cost of hundreds of thousands of CPU hours. Existing machine learning surrogates inherit the same limitation, where a stimulus is mapped to a single voltage response. We address this challenge by learning a conditional generative model for single-neuron electrophysiology, using flow matching with a velocity field conditioned on the input current. On biophysically detailed models of two human cortical interneuron types, the generated responses closely reproduce the electrophysiological feature distributions, spike-time structure, and excitability profiles, even matching the experimental recordings from the corresponding human cortical neurons. Near the firing threshold, firing and non-firing responses coexist at the same stimulus amplitude, and at high amplitudes, ensembles may split into low- and high-firing modes near depolarization block. We show that our model recovers both modes in each case, while a neural operator baseline suppresses spiking near threshold and blurs the gap between modes at depolarization block.
Typical changes in a neuronal circuit’s operating regime — such as shifts in sensorimotor conditions or in brain state — reshuffle firing rates across its neurons. One well-established key organising principle is rate preservation: firing rates correlate strongly across conditions. Here, we demonstrate that the joint d...
Neuronal excitability is commonly modeled using different principles at the cellular and population scales, making it difficult to study how microscopic mechanisms shape macroscopic activity. We introduce a spatiotemporal excitatory-inhibitory (EI) model that unifies these scales through a common mixed-feedback archite...
To understand neural computations, one would like to relate circuit dynamics to neuronal intrinsic excitability and connectivity. We developed tools for large-scale all-optical electrophysiology and applied them to approximately 300 layer 1 interneurons per mouse in vivo. Across two mice, targeted stimulation and volta...
Yitong Ǫi, Vicente J. Parot, Xiang Wu et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
A compact, reusable representation for array-wide spiking activity without learned assay-specific parameters is established, providing a scalable foundation for generative modeling across diverse neural preparations.
Md Sayed Tanveer, M. Mostajo-Radji, Wang Ge· 0 citations
Results show that learning in an ICMS task reshapes cortical circuits through activation-mechanism–dependent plasticity, underscoring the need for stimulation paradigms that adapt to both cell-intrinsic and network dynamics.
Robin Kim, Roy Lycke, Pavlo Zolotavin et al.· Science Advances· 0 citations
A key function of the human brain is its ability to dynamically adapt to novel contexts by integrating prior experience. While neural adaptation is widely observed across cortical systems, the microcircuit-level mechanisms governing its intensity and temporal dynamics remain unclear. To bridge this gap, we develop a re...
Diletta Bartolini, T. P. Reber, T. Tchumatchenko et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.