Skip to content
Open access

Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Repeat Vitrectomy Combined with Encircling Scleral Buckling for First Recurrent Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment After Primary Vitrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Sep 2026 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · Vol 15 · 0 citations · 24 references
Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate anatomical, visual, and safety outcomes after repeat pars plana vitrectomy combined with 360° encircling scleral buckling for first recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment following primary vitrectomy. Methods: This retrospective single-centre cohort included 47 eyes of 47 patients treated between October 2016 and October 2023. The primary outcome was freedom from any subsequent retinal re-detachment during available follow-up. Secondary outcomes included final best-corrected visual acuity, timing, and management of further re-detachment, silicone oil management, and postoperative complications. Exploratory analyses described break location and final visual outcomes according to selected clinical characteristics. Results: The median age was 57.6 years, and the median follow-up was 13 months. Freedom from any subsequent retinal re-detachment was achieved in 41/47 eyes (87.2%; 95% CI 74.8–94.0%). The median final visual acuity was 0.48 logMAR. Six eyes developed a subsequent re-detachment; four required further vitrectomy with retinectomy. Among 18 break-related first recurrences, 12 involved an inferior, inferonasal, or inferotemporal break, and no subsequent re-detachment was documented in these 12 eyes during available follow-up. Clinically relevant complications occurred in 11 eyes, including treated intraocular pressure elevation in seven and buckle exposure in four. Conclusions: Repeat vitrectomy with encircling scleral buckling was followed by freedom from subsequent retinal re-detachment in 87.2% of eyes. The descriptive break location findings identify inferior break-related recurrence as a candidate phenotype for future comparative evaluation, but the absence of a repeat PPV-only comparator precludes attribution of incremental benefit to the buckle.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.