By integrating technical, organizational, governance, governance, legal, economic, and implementation perspectives within a transparent and repeatable assessment process, the framework extends existing blockchain research from descriptive assessment factors toward actionable decision support.
Abstract
Blockchain has been widely recognized as a promising technology for inter-organizational collaboration in construction and transportation. However, many blockchain initiatives fail to progress beyond pilot projects. Existing blockchain adoption frameworks primarily identify adoption determinants or technol- ogy acceptance factors but provide limited support for structured, evidence-based feasibility assessment in domain-specific contexts. This paper presents a Design Science Research (DSR) approach to develop a blockchain feasibility assessment framework for public construction and transportation projects. The research was conducted through three iterative Design Science cycles. The Relevance Cycle identifies and validates blockchain-specific feasibility dimensions and assessment factors. The Design Cycle synthesizes these findings into a structured decision-support framework comprising a five-stage assessment process, seven feasibility dimensions, and 58 assessment factors supported by evidence-based scoring and imple- mentation guidance. The Rigor Cycle operationalizes the framework as a web-based decision-support system and evaluates its usability and practical applicability through expert assessment involving three construction and blockchain specialists. The evaluation produced an overall usability score of 4.73/5, in- dicating strong perceived usefulness, completeness, and practical applicability of the proposed artifact. By integrating technical, organizational, governance, legal, economic, and implementation perspectives within a transparent and repeatable assessment process, the framework extends existing blockchain adop- tion research from descriptive assessment factors toward actionable decision support.
Integrating blockchain technology into green building (GB) projects presents substantial opportunities to improve transparency, traceability, and collaboration in the construction sector. However, blockchain’s successful implementation into GB projects remains limited due to the lack of a clear understanding of the c...
Bilal Manzoor, Tarek M. Zayed, Hasan Haroglu et al.· Journal of construction engi...· 0 citations
Indonesia's national engineering accreditation system faces systemic inefficiencies, governance limitations, and data integrity challenges that hinder international recognition under the Washington Accord and impede the global mobility of engineering graduates. These shortcomings are compounded by fragmented audit trai...
Taufik Djatna· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
The findings indicate that the proposed blockchain-based claims management system (B-CMS) improves data integrity, transparency, traceability, and timeliness in claim administration compared with traditional approaches.
Rowaid Afridi, Rai Waqas Azfar, Muhammad Waqas et al.· Journal of Legal Affairs and...· 0 citations
Blockchain technology has emerged as a promising instrument for public sector digital transformation, yet its implementation remains constrained by technological, organizational, and institutional factors. This study’s aim is to identify the influence factors of blockchain implementation in the Romanian public sector b...
Radu-Octavian Kovacs, F. Virlanuta, Deniz Züngün et al.· Administrative Sciences· 0 citations
Blockchain technology offers potential to improve transparency, traceability, verification and accountability in construction material management, yet implementation requires human competencies and infrastructure. This study assesses training requirements and infrastructure readiness for blockchain-based construction m...
T. F. Okuntade, I. E. Augustine· LAUTECH Journal of Civil and...· 0 citations
The simulation testing and expert forum validation established that ProcuTrust is a trustworthy P&M system for BSS that meets industry requirements and the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT), and the strengths and opportunities that will benefit the industry, as well as the weaknesses and threats in t...
S. Hewavitharana, S. Perera, Xiao-Hua Jin et al.· Journal of construction engi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.