This work proposes ARMOR (Anchor Rollout and Mixed Optimization for RL), a framework that shifts the paradigm from passive penalty to active sample stabilization, enabling sustained performance improvements over extended training horizons.
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet the training process remains notoriously fragile. In this work, we investigate a critical source of this instability: over-optimization, where models exploit training heuristics at the expense of generalizable reasoning. While reverse KL regularization is the standard defense against such degradation, our analysis reveals that it is often insufficient in this regime, as it fails to ensure comprehensive coverage of the reference distribution. To address this, we propose ARMOR (Anchor Rollout and Mixed Optimization for RL), a framework that shifts the paradigm from passive penalty to active sample stabilization. ARMOR comprises two key components: (1) Anchor Rollout, which leverages off-policy data from the reference policy to preserve established solution patterns; and (2) Mixed Optimization, which reformulates the policy objective to enable controlled exploration without relying on auxiliary losses. Extensive experiments on reasoning benchmarks validate that ARMOR effectively mitigates validation collapse, enabling sustained performance improvements over extended training horizons.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the standard paradigm for enhancing the complex reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). To achieve sample efficiency, modern RL frameworks rely on importance sampling (IS). However, these algorithms suffer from an exploration-stability dilemma. Pure IS often leads to catastrophic training instability, while standard clipping mechanisms used to mitigate this instability strictly constrain the policy update budget. By formalizing the concept of Probability Capacity (Cap), we reveal that conservative clipping structurally stifles exploration by prematurely truncating the update budget for correct but low-confidence reasoning paths. To break free from these constraints, we propose Unbounded Positive Asymmetric Optimization (UP), a universal and plug-and-play objective. UP theoretically restructures the optimization process by anchoring the policy to its current state via the stop-gradient operator. This asymmetric design unleashes unclipped, stable gradients for positive advantages to maximize exploration, while maintaining standard clipping safeguards for negative advantages to prevent training instability. Furthermore, our formulation readily extends across different optimization granularities, including token-level (GRPO, DAPO) and sequence-level (GSPO) frameworks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UP enhances exploration capacity and achieves superior reasoning accuracy across diverse RL algorithms (DAPO, GSPO, and GRPO), model architectures (Dense, MoE, and vision-language), and training modalities (language and multimodal), validating UP as a truly universal plug-and-play enhancement for RL-based training.
Chongyu Fan, Pengfei Liu, Jingjia Huang et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes Single-rollout Autoregressive Policy Optimization (SAPO), a low-memory and compute-efficient framework in which the policy and value functions share a single autoregressive backbone, and introduces a trajectory-level generalized advantage estimator that combines lambda-returns with batch normalization.
Recent prominent post-training methods, such as Reinforcement Learning (RL) and On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD), have driven rapid progress in mathematical reasoning for large language models, yet their reliance on ground-truth labels precludes test-time training (TTT). Replacing ground truth with majority-vote pseudo-labels is a natural alternative, yet it is fragile: an incorrect vote corrupts the teacher and misleads every token. We observe that this failure mode is asymmetric: rollouts that disagree with the pseudo-label are typically wrong regardless of whether the vote itself is correct. Building on this observation, we propose Test-Time Policy Optimization (TTPO), an asymmetric objective that distills agreeing rollouts via OPSD and penalizes disagreeing rollouts with Grouped RL. Token-level selection further refines both branches: distillation down-weights already-converged positions, while RL penalizes only confident errors. Both updates remain well-grounded even under frequent pseudo-label errors, and majority-vote routing yields tighter self-supervision as the model improves. Without any labels, TTPO matches label-supervised OPSD on five competition-level benchmarks, raises Qwen3-1.7B from 38.0% to 45.2% in TTT, yields +25.2% to +36.4% without thinking, and shows strong cross-task generalization.
Aohan Wang, Zhengxi Lu, Jian-Ze Wang et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes two complementary strategies to improve the performance of value function RL: Privileged Value Functions (PVF) which provide an elegant mechanism to inject additional task-relevant token-level signal without biasing the policy objective; and TETHER, a baseline that adaptively interpolates between group-relative and value baselines depending on the value function accuracy.
S. Venkatraman, Matthieu Dinot, Laurence Aitchison· 0 citations
This work empirically study the potential of outer prefixes, revealing the mechanism of the impact of distributional discrepancy to the exploration dynamics in RLVR training and efficiently mitigates entropy collapse without requiring additional SFT, intricate reward designs, or complex prompting.
Xin Shen, Huishuai Zhang, Peng Li et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes TAPO: Transition-Aware Policy Optimization for LLM Agents, a unified training framework that alternates between policy optimization and transition supervision, and demonstrates that TAPO consistently improves task performance over pure policy optimization baselines.
Cong Li, Peixi Peng, Yisen Zhao et al.· 0 citations
