Oct 2026· Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Enhancing Security, Privacy, and Trust in Extended Reality· pp. 50-56· 0 citations· 10 references
TL;DR
Formal guarantees which bound how reliably an attacker can accurately identify the user's saccades (rapid eye movements) that leak information about the user's status are presented; and this bound is linked to the level of noise injected by a sample-level Gaussian noise privacy mechanism.
Abstract
Gaze data is increasingly used to support applications and interfaces in Mixed Reality (MR). At the same time, gaze data has the potential to leak sensitive information about the user's status and cognitive state. An attacker with access to this gaze data could exploit inferences about user status to identify when they are vulnerable. Privacy mechanisms add noise to gaze data streams to obfuscate events and extracted features to protect against such inferences. In this paper, we present formal guarantees which bound how reliably an attacker can accurately identify the user's saccades (rapid eye movements) that leak information about the user's status; and link this bound to the level of noise injected by a sample-level Gaussian noise privacy mechanism. We formulate a complementary formal bound on data utility based on noise level when gaze pointing is used for selection. These bounds enable a formal analysis of privacy-utility trade-offs. We conducted an MR user study with 27 participants' data to validate our formal guarantees against spatial attacks. Our findings suggest that we can place mathematical bounds on continuous signals through fundamental events that define the signal, and limit the information leaked about user status and ultimately balance privacy and utility in critical MR settings.
This work studies whether gaze data representation choice can serve as a lightweight privacy control at feature extraction, before adding perturbation or formal privacy mechanisms, and compares three gaze representations under matched model capacity.
Cory Ilo, Brendan John, Doug A. Bowman· 0 citations
Mixed-reality headsets such as Apple Vision Pro replace the touchscreen with gaze-as-pointer interaction: the wearer looks at a target and confirms with an air pinch. Because the display is inside the headset and the eye tracker is walled off from third-party software, such input is widely assumed to be unobservable to...
Hwanjo Heo, Junhee Lee, Jinwoo Kim· Proceedings of the 25th Work...· 0 citations
This SoK examines 134 relevant papers on privacy concerns in motion patterns recorded by XR headsets, including how adversaries can obtain users'motion patterns, the inferences they can draw from them, and methods for protecting users and clarifies the state of XR motion privacy.
Azim Ibragimov, Alina Vasina, Uliana Polshcha et al.· 1 citation
Eye-movement authentication in virtual reality (VR) needs longitudinal training data, yet most such datasets come from lab trackers. We convert lab recordings to a VR headset's signal quality while keeping their eye movement, using only unpaired VR recordings of other people. Measurements show that the headset's added...
Md Arif Shahriar, Mehedi Hasan Raju, Oleg V. Komogortsev· 0 citations
Be My Eyes provides a volunteer-powered visual description service that connects over one million blind and low vision users with more than ten million volunteers for everyday visual assistance tasks as well as Be My AI, an AI-powered counterpart. In this work, we qualitatively analyze 1,428 one-, two-, and three-star...
Overall, unconditional diffusion captures local gaze kinematics and short-range temporal and directional structure, while long-range properties such as saccade counts and cumulative path geometry remain targets for future conditioned models.
Laxman Basnet, Alexander Szorkovszky, Pedro G. Lind et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.