This SoK examines 134 relevant papers on privacy concerns in motion patterns recorded by XR headsets, including how adversaries can obtain users'motion patterns, the inferences they can draw from them, and methods for protecting users and clarifies the state of XR motion privacy.
Abstract
Extended Reality (XR) provides immersive, interactive 3D experiences. To enable these experiences, the devices must track user motion so the system can respond to actions such as grabbing, looking at, or moving an object. However, motion tracking has raised privacy concerns since it records a person's motion patterns. These motion patterns have been studied extensively across various fields (i.e., gait identification and profiling) and have been shown to reveal sensitive information. With the adoption of XR, these patterns became easier to record and obtain than ever. This creates a fundamental privacy tension: motion tracking enables core XR functionality yet requires users to compromise their privacy. Prior systematization-of-knowledge (SoK) studies on XR privacy have examined the field broadly, with motion-related research distributed across several privacy domains rather than treated as a distinct area of study. However, XR motion privacy has gained significant momentum since the prior SoK, with the literature nearly quadrupling in size and thereby warranting a dedicated systematization of this topic. This SoK examines 134 relevant papers on privacy concerns in motion patterns recorded by XR headsets, including how adversaries can obtain users'motion patterns, the inferences they can draw from them, and methods for protecting users. Based on this review, we synthesize a taxonomy of motion modalities, representations, and inference risks; develop an XR motion threat model; systematize the attack and defense approaches in the XR motion literature; identify gaps in the literature; and provide guidelines for future studies evaluating motion privacy mechanisms. Together, our SoK clarifies the state of XR motion privacy and provides recommendations for future evaluations.
It is found that user studies explain substantially more variation in mechanism acceptance than physical deviation, although physical deviation remains significant.
Formal guarantees which bound how reliably an attacker can accurately identify the user's saccades (rapid eye movements) that leak information about the user's status are presented; and this bound is linked to the level of noise injected by a sample-level Gaussian noise privacy mechanism.
Miguel Angel Lopez, Anish S. Narkar, J. Michalak et al.· Proceedings of the Second Wo...· 0 citations
D dorsal hand morphometrics is proposed as an effective and more privacy-preserving biometric modality for in-session age assurance in XR, by exploiting the egocentric cameras that XR headsets inherently and naturally use to capture gesture interactions.
Riccardo Bovo, G. Loukas, Josh P. Davis· 0 citations
Mid-air PIN entry in virtual reality is vulnerable to observation and replay: once an attacker learns the credential, access to sensitive data, collaboration spaces, or financial workflows is compromised. We investigate transactional VR authentication, which combines what you know (the PIN) with how you act (behavioral...
Numan Zafar, S. Chaudhry· Proceedings of the 28th Inte...· 0 citations
This survey is the first to systematically study smart glasses through a unified framework, formalizing first-person data flow and constrained task utility, and introducing an L0-L5 framework spanning capture, reactive perception, contextual assistance, persistent state, governed action, and embodied coupling.
In privacy research on radiofrequency-based protocols, the dominant focus has remained on Bluetooth, WiFi, and Zigbee, while a broader and arguably more consequential attack surface has gone largely unnoticed: the privacy risks created by the composition of everyday wireless protocols. Widely deployed systems such as K...
Larry Hernandez· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
During the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences’ 75th Anniversary Symposium, President Sally Kornbluth said “MIT has never needed your particular insight and guidance more than we do now.”
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 22, 2026
“X-Hinges” helps design and 3D print items like lamps and gloves with an interactive twist: automatically embedded sensors that perceive and adaptively respond to human contact.