Skip to content

SoK: Motion Data Privacy in Extended Reality

Sep 2026 · 1 citation · 165 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This SoK examines 134 relevant papers on privacy concerns in motion patterns recorded by XR headsets, including how adversaries can obtain users'motion patterns, the inferences they can draw from them, and methods for protecting users and clarifies the state of XR motion privacy.

Abstract

Extended Reality (XR) provides immersive, interactive 3D experiences. To enable these experiences, the devices must track user motion so the system can respond to actions such as grabbing, looking at, or moving an object. However, motion tracking has raised privacy concerns since it records a person's motion patterns. These motion patterns have been studied extensively across various fields (i.e., gait identification and profiling) and have been shown to reveal sensitive information. With the adoption of XR, these patterns became easier to record and obtain than ever. This creates a fundamental privacy tension: motion tracking enables core XR functionality yet requires users to compromise their privacy. Prior systematization-of-knowledge (SoK) studies on XR privacy have examined the field broadly, with motion-related research distributed across several privacy domains rather than treated as a distinct area of study. However, XR motion privacy has gained significant momentum since the prior SoK, with the literature nearly quadrupling in size and thereby warranting a dedicated systematization of this topic. This SoK examines 134 relevant papers on privacy concerns in motion patterns recorded by XR headsets, including how adversaries can obtain users'motion patterns, the inferences they can draw from them, and methods for protecting users. Based on this review, we synthesize a taxonomy of motion modalities, representations, and inference risks; develop an XR motion threat model; systematize the attack and defense approaches in the XR motion literature; identify gaps in the literature; and provide guidelines for future studies evaluating motion privacy mechanisms. Together, our SoK clarifies the state of XR motion privacy and provides recommendations for future evaluations.

View source

Similar papers

Book Open access Oct 2026

Formal Guarantees for Securing XR User Status in Streams of Eye-Tracking Data

Formal guarantees which bound how reliably an attacker can accurately identify the user's saccades (rapid eye movements) that leak information about the user's status are presented; and this bound is linked to the level of noise injected by a sample-level Gaussian noise privacy mechanism.

Miguel Angel Lopez, Anish S. Narkar, J. Michalak et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Dorsal Hand Images for Immersive (XR) and Privacy-preserving Age Assurance and Child Safety

D dorsal hand morphometrics is proposed as an effective and more privacy-preserving biometric modality for in-session age assurance in XR, by exploiting the egocentric cameras that XR headsets inherently and naturally use to capture gesture interactions.

Riccardo Bovo, G. Loukas, Josh P. Davis · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

What you know, How you act: Transactional VR Authentication

Mid-air PIN entry in virtual reality is vulnerable to observation and replay: once an attacker learns the credential, access to sensitive data, collaboration spaces, or financial workflows is compromised. We investigate transactional VR authentication, which combines what you know (the PIN) with how you act (behavioral...

Numan Zafar, S. Chaudhry · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

From Seeing to Acting: Smart Glasses as First-Person Intelligence Platforms

This survey is the first to systematically study smart glasses through a unified framework, formalizing first-person data flow and constrained task utility, and introducing an L0-L5 framework spanning capture, reactive perception, contextual assistance, persistent state, governed action, and embodied coupling.

Jiang-Ning Zhang, Haojun Chen, Yong Liu · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

The hidden life of signals: Time-domain inferences and other privacy attacks on everyday devices

In privacy research on radiofrequency-based protocols, the dominant focus has remained on Bluetooth, WiFi, and Zigbee, while a broader and arguably more consequential attack surface has gone largely unnoticed: the privacy risks created by the composition of everyday wireless protocols. Widely deployed systems such as K...

Larry Hernandez · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Reinforcing the value of human understanding at MIT

During the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences’ 75th Anniversary Symposium, President Sally Kornbluth said “MIT has never needed your particular insight and guidance more than we do now.”

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.