Skip to content
Review Open access

LiDAR-IMU Sensor Fusion for Real-Time Adaptive Vibration Suppression in Autonomous Passenger Boarding Bridges: Full-Scale Field Validation

2026 · IEEE Access · Vol 14, pp. 128886-128904 · 0 citations · 32 references

Abstract

Passenger boarding bridges are increasingly adopting autonomous docking to improve airport operational efficiency; however, contact-induced structural vibrations, whose modal characteristics vary with aircraft class, cabin height, and docking speed, continue to limit safety and docking accuracy. Conventional input-shaping and fixed-gain controllers operate reactively using only proprioceptive measurements and cannot cope with such time-varying dynamics. This paper presents the design, real-time realization, and full-scale field validation of a preview-aware adaptive input-shaping framework that couples exteroceptive three-dimensional light detection and ranging with an inertial measurement unit under a model predictive control horizon. A dual-band sensing architecture is formulated from the Nyquist characteristics of each sensor: low-frequency structural modes between 0.5 and 5 Hz are estimated from point cloud-based motion tracking of the bridge-aircraft contact geometry, while high-frequency modes between 5 and 50 Hz are captured by the onboard inertial sensor. The estimated modal parameters continuously reconfigure a dual-stage zero-vibration-derivative shaper whose impulse sequence is embedded as a soft preview constraint within the predictive cost, simultaneously enforcing trajectory tracking, vibration suppression, and actuation limits. An input-to-state stability argument, detailed in the Appendix, establishes closed-loop boundedness under bounded frequency-estimation error. The framework is implemented on a full-scale 12.5-ton boarding bridge at Incheon International Airport and evaluated docking trials spanning eight operational scenarios, including sensor-degradation cases. Experimental results demonstrate a 73.5 % reduction in residual vibration amplitude, a 75.4 % reduction in overshoot, and a 63.4 % improvement in settling time against five conventional baselines, while maintaining real-time feasibility at an average cycle time of 18 milliseconds.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.