This work studies an activation alignment, a map from a source model's layerwise activations to a target's, and factors this map into a layer map, whose output is an explicit target-by-source matrix that can be extracted and inspected, and a layer-shared feature map between hidden spaces.
Abstract
LLMs are released at a rapid pace, raising a natural question: how do two independently trained models relate, both in which layers correspond and in how features transform between them? We study this by learning an activation alignment, a map from a source model's layerwise activations to a target's. Our method, MATCHA, factors this map into a layer map, whose output is an explicit target-by-source matrix that can be extracted and inspected, and a layer-shared feature map between hidden spaces. Most of prior work fixes the layer correspondence in advance, pairing layers at roughly the same relative depth; in contrast, we learn both factors jointly from prompts. Across 42 pairs of seven models spanning three different families, MATCHA reconstructs the target's activations more faithfully and improves retrieval-based metrics substantially, w.r.t. previous approaches. The recovered maps are broadly monotone in depth but, in contrast with most previous approaches, are consistently many-to-many: each target layer draws on a band of source layers. Our alignments also enable transfer of activation-space interventions, allowing steering vectors and probes developed for one model to transfer to another.
Representation alignment speeds up diffusion transformer training by pulling an intermediate block of the model (student) toward features of a frozen pretrained encoder (teacher). Which teacher layer to align, and for how long, is still set by convention, and each alternative costs a training run. We find that alignmen...
Yong-Cong Wang, Hingchin Chen, Ming-Yu Fan et al.· 0 citations
Alignment between human high-level visual representations and those of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offers a quantitative framework for understanding information processing in human vision. However, similarities between model and brain representations do not directly reveal the semantic content underlying t...
Tan-Guang Gao, Lu-Yuan Zhang, Yi-Fei Wang et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We propose LAYERSCOPE, a label-free, layerwise framework that aims to characterize a model's learned representations in video and multimodal settings. Evaluating downstream performance using representations from final or intermediate layers typically requires large amounts of labeled data, repeated task-specific evalua...
Sandra Arcos-Holzinger, Debashish Chakraborty, Rohita Mocharla et al.· 0 citations
It is suggested that linking a model's internal features to its errors and their effects on performance may help select training images that improve performance, thereby allowing the model's current state to guide which images are labeled next.
Yushi Nakaya, K. Higuchi, Shuichi Ishida· 0 citations
Global vision--language similarities compress an image and a caption into one vector, preserving semantics but not which word corresponds to which region or how those regions are arranged; a model can recognize every word and object yet prefer a compositionally incorrect caption. We argue that a frozen encoder retains...
Liu-Yang Song, Yi Zhang, Zhong-Yi Deng et al.· 0 citations
While representation similarity across independently trained language models is well-documented, how internal mechanics such as attention behave across models remains far less characterized. Inspired by this gap, we examine the structure of post-softmax attention weights by marginalizing over query positions, mapping t...
Valentino Maiorca, Walter Nelson, Francesco Locatello· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.