Jul 2026· International journal of multidisciplinary research and analysis· 0 citations
TL;DR
This review highlights the field's strong interdisciplinary character and reveals the current challenges that the sector faces, and outlines a systematic research program to guide further studies of the implementation, impact, and problems of GenAI in enterprises and communities.
Abstract
In this systematic literature review, we aimed to identify and thoroughly analyze the existing scientific knowledge related to a notably emerging field of generative AI. In strict adherence to the SPAR-4-SLR protocol, we focus on 1,104 peer-reviewed articles from the Scopus database, published between 2015 and 2025. Using bibliometric and thematic mapping methods, we address two main research questions: the first concerns the major publication trends in GenAI research, and the second deals with the intellectual structures and thematic domains shaping the field. Our results indicate an abrupt increase in scientific production since 2022, a consequence of the launch of models such as GPT, DALL·E, and Stable Diffusion, which are becoming increasingly powerful. We further identify five main research clusters: the technological foundations of generative AI, where researchers focus on building and utilizing LLMs and deep learning; professional and educational applications; ethical and governance issues; AI-assisted creativity; and user perceptions. Additionally, we find that higher education plays a significant role in the area, both in the application of ideas and the exploration of relevant questions. This review highlights the field's strong interdisciplinary character and, at the same time, reveals the current challenges that the sector faces. We outline a systematic research program to guide further studies of the implementation, impact, and problems of GenAI in enterprises and communities.
A five-phase framework comprising Strategic Conceptualisation, Systematic Literature Synthesis, Methodology Selection, Governance, Ethics and Trust, and Continuous Reflection and Feedback is proposed, positioning the human touch, curiosity, critical thinking, critical thinking, creativity, contextual expertise, and eth...
Niranjan Devkota, M. Siddique, Dipendra Karki et al.· International Research Journ...· 0 citations
A bibliometric analysis of scientific publications indexed in the Scopus database provides a comprehensive understanding of the evolution, current trends, and future directions of Generative AI for Learning research, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and responsible AI implementation to supp...
L. Judijanto· West Science Interdisciplina...· 0 citations
A comprehensive mixed-methods investigation into the impact of GenAI on research evaluation and scholarly communication is presented, combining a large-scale survey of 2,850 researchers, editors, and graduate students with a quantitative analysis of 18,000 manuscripts submitted to 12 peer-reviewed journals between 2022...
Ravi Ranjan, Ritesh Kandari, Anirudh Gupta, Divya· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
The aim of this study is to explore the current state of 'AI vs AI' by generating a dataset comprising texts, images, audio and video, utilizing a set of freely available AI tools, based on a two-stage strategy.
Anastasiia Iufereva, Peter Mozelius· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
This study develops an integrated theoretical framework that maps directional relationships among the four research domains, identifies cultural context and disclosure practices as key moderators, and generates testable propositions for future investigation.
Gui Jun, Nasrullah Dharejo, M. Alivi· Journalism and Media· 0 citations
This PRISMA-guided bibliometric and abstract-level thematic review maps peer-reviewed industrial GAI research published from 2022 to 4 June 2026 contributes a reproducible cross-domain map, an overlap-aware synthesis, and stakeholder-specific guidance for trustworthy industrial GAI.