Skip to content
Open access

Research in the Age of AI – How to Plan? A Bibliometric Exploration of the Research Lifecycle

Jul 2026 · International Research Journal of MMC · 0 citations · 33 references

TL;DR

A five-phase framework comprising Strategic Conceptualisation, Systematic Literature Synthesis, Methodology Selection, Governance, Ethics and Trust, and Continuous Reflection and Feedback is proposed, positioning the human touch, curiosity, critical thinking, critical thinking, creativity, contextual expertise, and ethical judgement, as the foundation of responsible AI-assisted research planning.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI and large language models (LLMs), is rapidly transforming research planning by enhancing literature synthesis, research problem formulation, methodology selection, and workflow management. Despite this rapid adoption, limited evidence exists regarding the intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and responsible integration of AI within research planning. Therefore, this study systematically maps the scientific landscape of AI-assisted research planning through a bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Scopus database between 2017 and 2026. Bibliographic data were analysed using Biblioshiny (Bibliometrix) and VOSviewer to examine publication trends, influential contributors, collaboration networks, intellectual structure, and thematic development. The findings reveal a rapidly expanding research domain, with an annual publication growth rate of 51.08%, reflecting the increasing integration of AI into research planning. Science mapping identifies research management, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and large language models as the dominant research themes, while thematic evolution demonstrates a shift from foundational AI technologies towards AI-enabled research management and workflows. However, the analysis also reveals a significant conceptual imbalance, with technological advancements outpacing the development of governance, trust, ethics, and human–AI collaboration. To address this gap, the study proposes a five-phase framework comprising Strategic Conceptualisation, Systematic Literature Synthesis, Methodology Selection, Governance, Ethics and Trust, and Continuous Reflection and Feedback, positioning the human touch, curiosity, critical thinking, creativity, contextual expertise, and ethical judgement, as the foundation of responsible AI-assisted research planning. The study contributes both a comprehensive knowledge map and a human-centred conceptual framework that provide practical guidance for researchers, scholars, and policymakers seeking to promote the responsible, transparent, and sustainable integration of AI throughout the research planning process.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Mapping the Research Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management: A Bibliometric Analysis

It is demonstrated that AI-HRM research is evolving in parallel with technological advances and the expanding integration of AI into HRM practices, and provides a foundation for researchers to identify emerging topics, underexplored areas, and future research opportunities in AI-enabled HRM.

R. Pratama, Edris Santoso, P. Sumantri et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI and Scientific Thinking: A Bibliometric Study

A bibliometric analysis was conducted to examine publication trends, disciplinary distributions, international collaborations, and their alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to indicate a rapid acceleration of research output post-2019.

Konstantinos Karampelas · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Charting the Evolution of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Insights from A Systematic Literature Review

This review highlights the field's strong interdisciplinary character and reveals the current challenges that the sector faces, and outlines a systematic research program to guide further studies of the implementation, impact, and problems of GenAI in enterprises and communities.

Majdouline Attaoui, Wissal Attaoui, Anas Moukrim et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Generative AI for Learning: A Bibliometric Mapping of Global Scientific Publications

A bibliometric analysis of scientific publications indexed in the Scopus database provides a comprehensive understanding of the evolution, current trends, and future directions of Generative AI for Learning research, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and responsible AI implementation to supp...

L. Judijanto · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Mapping the Evolution of AI Feedback in ESL/EFL Writing: A Chronological Bibliometric Analysis

The study provides a structured overview of the field and points to the need for more transparent reporting of AI tools, feedback types, revision procedures, and higher-level writing features such as cohesion, coherence, argumentation, and development.

Wen-Peng Li, M. Saeed, Rozita Che Omar · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.