Skip to content
Open access

Four weeks of blood flow restriction between high-intensity interval repetitions improves intermittent exercise performance in trained cyclists

Sep 2026 · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · 0 citations · 26 references

Abstract

Blood flow restriction (BFR) alters acute physiological responses when applied during recovery between high-intensity interval training (HIIT) repetitions, but its chronic effects on intermittent performance are unclear. This study investigated whether 4-weeks of BFR during HIIT recovery enhances physiological measures and intermittent performance in trained cyclists. Ten trained male cyclists (mean ± SD, age: 27.5 ± 6.8 years; body mass: 76.4 ± 14.2 kg; incremental-test V˙O 2PEAK : 59.8 ± 7.1 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ) completed eight HIIT sessions across 4-weeks, each comprising six 30-s efforts at 85% of maximal 30-s sprint power (562 ± 94 W), separated by 4.5-min recovery phases. Participants were assigned to BFR (n = 5; 2-min bilateral thigh cuff inflation at 200 mmHg during recovery) or control (n = 5; passive recovery). Pre- and post-intervention assessments included a maximal incremental test, 30-s sprint test, and intermittent cycling test. Two-way ANOVAs revealed significant condition × time interactions. Compared with controls, the BFR group showed greater improvements in power at lactate threshold (20 ± 15 W; 7.4 ± 5.4% vs −2 ± 10 W; −0.5 ± 3.6%), 30-s mean power output (50 ± 23 W; 7.5 ± 4.1% vs 10 ± 27 W; 1.5 ± 4.1%), intermittent test duration (117 ± 64 s; 59.9 ± 56.7% vs 6 ± 64 s; −4.3 ± 20.6%), and V˙O 2PEAK during the intermittent test (4.4 ± 1.2 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ; 7.4 ± 2.1% vs 1.3 ± 2.1 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ; 1.8 ± 3.2%) (all p < 0.05). These findings suggest that BFR during HIIT recovery phases enhances physiological measures and intermittent performance more than HIIT alone.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.