It is concluded that effective use of agentic AI requires both domain expertise to frame questions and evaluate outputs, and coding literacy to guide the AI's approach, while outlining future opportunities for agentic AI workflow to advance the environmental health sciences.
Abstract
Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems that are capable of planning and executing multi-step analytical tasks are increasingly available to environmental health researchers, but their reliability in real-world practice has not been fully explored. This paper describes a human-in-the-loop agentic framework for environmental health research, involving the review, verification, and correction of AI-generated data analysis code and results at each step - a process that mirrors the mentorship structure of traditional research teams. This approach offers a path toward rigorous, reproducible use of agentic AI in routine data-rich environmental health research. We illustrate this framework through a case study analyzing nitrogenous organic contaminants at U.S. Superfund sites, a chemical family linked to the emerging tire-derived contaminants 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone. Using an agentic large language model to generate R code for data filtering, spatial mapping, and cluster analysis, we document instances where initial agentic AI outputs benefited from a human-in-the-loop process to produce more rigorous and reproducible results. We conclude that effective use of agentic AI requires both domain expertise to frame questions and evaluate outputs, and coding literacy to guide the AI's approach, while outlining future opportunities for agentic AI workflow to advance the environmental health sciences.
Background. Agentic AI systems independently decompose tasks such as literature search, data analysis, and programming into subtasks, search the web, access databases, and execute code. This allows them to perform digital research tasks at high speed. Objectives. Under what conditions does the use of agentic systems pr...
Agentic artificial intelligence (AAI) is increasingly used by biomedical scientists, where it has substantially lowered the difficulty of integrating computational, statistical and data-science approaches into day-to-day research activities, assisting with project design, analysis and manuscript preparation. Significan...
Timothy Wu, Tyler S. Browne, Mohamed Meawad et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Agentic artificial intelligence (AI), comprising autonomous, goal-oriented systems capable of reasoning, planning, and coordinating multi-step clinical workflows under clinician oversight, is emerging as a transformative paradigm in modern healthcare. This study presents a systematic review of its conceptual foundation...
Recent advances in agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have marked a shift in AI for Science: moving away from the use of individual AI systems for narrow task execution, toward multi-agent systems capable of orchestrating complex, end-to-end research workflows and performing (semi-)autonomous scientific disco...
Nenad Tomasev, Matija Franklin, Atoosa Kasirzadeh et al.· 0 citations
BixBench3, a benchmark that measures the capacity of AI agents to process raw biological data through to scientific results, reveals that LLMs vary substantially in their ability to execute multiple sequential analysis steps coherently, manage large quantities of raw data, and work across scientific domains.
Zane Koch, A. Wassie, Javier Valdes-Aleman et al.· 5 citations· ⚡3
It is argued that each of the four challenges facing responsible development is addressed by a clinical testing harness: a structured evaluation environment comprising scenario libraries built from clinical edge cases, full-trajectory observability, explicit escalation testing, and staged evidence thresholds tied to sc...
E. Waisberg, Joseph W. Guarnieri· Annals of Biomedical Enginee...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.