Skip to content
#data science Open access

Feedback engagement strategies and metrics for consumers in vulnerable circumstances: An empty rapid review and recommendations for further research

Oct 2026 · Routledge Open Research · 34 references
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

Abstract

Across sectors, there is an increasing recognition of the need to identify and support consumers in vulnerable situations. To assess whether existing support measures are effective and how they might be improved, satisfaction surveys are commonly used. However, low response rates and the under-representation of the most vulnerable groups are well-documented challenges threatening the representativeness, validity and consequently usefulness of survey data to understand their experiences. Moreover, it remains unclear whether these surveys effectively measure what they intend to. A rapid review of the peer-reviewed evidence was conducted to (i) identify barriers and explore strategies to increase participation in feedback mechanisms among consumers experiencing vulnerability within the energy, water, telecommunications and finance service sectors, and (ii) examine the availability and use of (validated) feedback or satisfaction measures for these groups. The review protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/tqnvr). Searches were conducted in Web of Science and ProQuest Social Science databases in July 2025, and updated in August 2026, additionally including ProQuest ABI/INFORM Collection, ProQuest Sociology Collection, Scopus, Business Source Ultimate, EconLit and PsycINFO. No report met the inclusion criteria, highlighting a gap in the peer-reviewed empirical literature in the searched databases evaluating the effectiveness, validity and inclusiveness of feedback approaches for consumers in vulnerable circumstances. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether existing and potential alternative approaches are adequate for these groups. The review concludes with recommendations for future research to design and evaluate accessible, valid, and representative approaches to collect feedback from consumers experiencing vulnerability.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.